학술논문
法人의 權利能力에 관한 一考
이용수 9
- 영문명
- Legal Capacity of a Juristic Person Limitations Based on the Scope of Objects Supreme Court Decision No. 2000-Geu-98, decided on September 21, 2001
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 김종률(Kim, Jong-yull)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제24호, 305~325쪽, 전체 21쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2003.09.30
5,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Article 34 of the Korean Civil Act states the following concerning the Legal Capacity of Juristic Persons : A juristic person shall be subject to rights and obligations in accordance with the relevant laws and within the scope of its objects as determined by its Articles of Incorporation. In other words, the Article provides that the legal capacity of a juristic person is limited by the objects that appear in its Articles of Incorporation, the nature of a juristic person generally, and the relevant laws of the jurisdiction in which it exists. As a result, the following questions arise: (1) Theoretically. what dces the phrase objects as determined by the Articles of Incorporation mean? (2) On what ground can it be determined whether the behavior of any juristic person is within the scope of its objects as determined by the Articles of Incorporation? (3) Considering that the Korean Commercial Act contains no analogous provision to Article 34 of the Civil Act, may Article 34 be applied to any corporation, i.e., any typical juristic person whose object is to make a profit? In responding to these questions, the Korean Supreme Court in the above-mentioned decision held that (1) objects as determined by the Articles of Incorporation meant that the legal capacity of a Juristic person is limited by the laws that provided a basis for the incorporation: that (2) behavior of a juristic person is considered within the scope of its Articles of Incorporation if it is directly or indirectly necessary to perform the objects: and that (3) whether any behavior is necessary for the realization of a juristic person s objects should be determined abstractly and objectively, rather than in accordance with the actor s specific subjective intention. The above-mentioned Supreme Court decision is generally consistent with previous precedents holding that although the legal capacity of juristic person is limited by its objects as determined by the Articles of Incorporation, the scope of the objects should be interpreted broadly. In the author s opinion is that the above-mentioned decision. albeit correct in the strict letter of the law, is problematic as interpreted and applied. The decision adheres to the theory of ultra vires, which many consider to have been substantively abandoned in Anglo-American law, i,e., the origin of the theory. However, in effect, the decision eviscerates the theory by enlarging the scope of the juristic person s objects to the extent that the language of Article 34 is meaningless.
목차
「판례평석요지」
「사실의 개요」
「당사자의 주장」
「원심의 판단」
「대법원결정의 요지」
「硏究」
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 유엔統一賣買法과 韓國賣買法
- 法人의 權利能力에 관한 一考
- 債務不履行責任과 瑕疵擔保責任의 통합 모색
- 現行 成年者保護를 위한 制度의 問題點과 代案으로서의 成年後見制度
- 경매절차진행시 저당권이 변제로 소멸된 경우의 처리
- 최근 국제적 동향에서 바라 본 우리 民法上의 賣渡人의 瑕疵擔保責任에 관한 硏究
- 東아시아法系論에 관한 試論
- 프랑스법상 하자보수를 위한 건축주의 강제공사보험
- 中國의 製造物責任法의 特徵과 問題點
- 유럽통일계약법과 한국매매법
- 性轉換의 民事法上 問題
- 韓國의 賣買法과 中國의 賣買法
- 독일 급부장애법상 채권각론과의 조화와 시사점
- 北韓의 賣買法
- 도급계약의 목적물 하자로 인한 하자보수비산정과 방법
- 매매계약의 교섭 및 성립
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!