본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

채권양도금지 특약의 효력

이용수 91

영문명
Prohibition of Assignment and its Effect
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
전원열(Wonyol Jon)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제75호, 167~201쪽, 전체 35쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.06.30
7,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The size of receivables trading has been rapidly increased since the end of 20th century. The representative of those receivables trading is asset securitization. Traditionally, there have been two positions in analyzing the effect of Prohibition of Assignment. One position says that a prohibition agreement between creditor and debtor provides an absolute effect not only between them but also between others, especially with assignees. The other position says that such agreement provides only relative effect between creditor and debtor so that the assignee would not be affected. The revision trend in various jurisdictions, including German Commerce Code, French Civil Code, American Uniform Commercial Code, United Nations Convention on the Assignment of Receivables in International Trade, UNDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Principles of European Contract Law and Draft Common Frame of Reference, is heading toward the relative effect position. In the course of preparing draft provision, the Revision Committee of Korea does not seem to have paid enough attention to the international trends and the positions of other jurisdictions. Although various acts and codes with the relative effect do not have singular content, the draft provision, proposed by the Revision Committee, did not delve deeply into the meaning of relative effect. On the other hand, when we come to review additionally on the draft provision, we should adjust between the interest of the debtor and the assignee. Also, a certain area, where assignments are absolutely valid in spite of prohibition clause, is needed. To conclude, more attention should be paid to the legal effect of assignment prohibition agreements.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 讓渡禁止特約의 성격 논의에 관하여
Ⅲ. 양도금지특약에 관한 각국의 입법례 및 동향
Ⅳ. 우리나라 민법 채권양도 조항 개정의 방향에 관하여
Ⅴ. 결론
<참고문헌>

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

전원열(Wonyol Jon). (2016).채권양도금지 특약의 효력. 민사법학, (75), 167-201

MLA

전원열(Wonyol Jon). "채권양도금지 특약의 효력." 민사법학, .75(2016): 167-201

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제