고등학교 가정과 교육을 위한 교과과정 영역별 필요도

• 영문명: A Study on the Need for Curriculum Contents in each Sub-area of High School Home Economics Education
• 발행기관: 한국가정과교육학회
• 저자명: 김행자(Kim, Haeng-Ja) 안영희(An, Yeong-Hee) 이남기(Lee, Nam-Gee) 이금남(Lee, Geum-Nam)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국가정과교육학회지』제8권 제1호, 1~10쪽, 전체 10쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1996.06.30

영문 초록

This study aims at finding a new home economics education which will include male and female students as its teaching objects, and then providing home economics teachers with useful materials. For this purpose I examined analyzed male and female the upper secondary school students and parents recognition and demand to the home economics education. The conclusion of this study is summarized as follows: 1. There was significant difference between male students(73.7%) and female students(89.8%) in the necessity for studying Home Economics(P<.001). In necessity of Home Economics education, male students emphasized the spiritual part but female students emphasized the functional part. In part of parents, there was no significant difference between fathers(95.5%) and mothers(96.4%). 2. The necessity of each part in the contents of Home Economics 1) In the part of family, there was significant difference between male and female students in the true nature of family, the role and responsibility of family, and the laws relating to family(P<.001). There was significant difference between mothers and fathers in the true nature of family and the role and responsibility of family. Fathers and male students emphasized the true nature of family and the role and responsibility of family more than mothers and female students did. 2) In the Home management and economy parts, there was significant difference between male and female students in the significance of home management(P<.001), the relation of family to society(P<.001), and fluctuating measures for home economy. There was significant difference between fathers and mothers in the relation of family to society(P<.05). Fathers and male students emphasized the relation of family to society more than mothers and female students did. Mothers, male and female students emphasized the importance of the protection of consumers. 3) In the clothes part, male students emphasized the role of clothes, the design and making of clothes(P<.001), the present situation of the resources of clothing and the distribution of clothes(P<.05) more than female students did. 5) In the part of housing, male students emphasized home planning, and arrangements and facilities of house more than female students did. Female students emphasized the interior of the house(P<.05). Fathers emphasized the planning of a residential space and arrangements and facilities of a house(P<.05) more than mothers did. 6) In the parts of human development and upbringing, male students emphasized the significance of being parents, family planning and the population problem(P<.001), pregnancy and delivery(P<.01), and the characteristic of juvenile development(P<.05) more than female students did. Parents and students emphasized the importance of prevention and countermeasure for diseases and the significance of being parents.