의료윤리적 측면에서 본 비자발적 강제입원

• 영문명: Medicoethical Aspect of Involuntary and Compulsory Admission
• 발행기관: 대한신경정신의학회
• 저자명: 정영인 이영민
• 간행물 정보: 『신경정신의학』제51권 제3호, 107~112쪽, 전체 6쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 정신과학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.05.31

영문 초록

Involuntary and compulsive admission can damage a patient’s autonomy from a medicoethical aspect, but the patient who cannot understand information and explanations from a psychiatrist due to impaired judgment and lacks insight can have impaired judgment in certain circumstances. The decision making of a patient without substantial autonomy in a psychotic or intoxicated state can be justly neglected by the psychiatrist for the patient’s sake. Compulsory admission is generally permitted only in case that a patient presents a danger to himself or others, which is not of a benefit to the patient not in danger because of the loss of the opportunity to take appropriate treatment. This enables psychiatrists not to abuse medical paternalism and to protect from the damage to patient’s autonomy and civil right. Compulsive admission can be ethically justified to keep the principle of the least restrictive treatment and the patient’s right to appropriate treatment. Psychiatrists should help enhance the patient’s underestimated autonomy on the basis of the limited paternalism

목차

서 론

환자의 자율성

의료윤리적 입장에서 본 비자발적 강제 입원

결 론

REFERENCES

키워드

Autonomy Ethics Involuntary and compulsory admission Paternalism