한글판 차원적 강박척도의 표준화 연구

• 영문명: A Validation Study of the Korean-Version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale
• 발행기관: 대한신경정신의학회
• 저자명: 김혜원 강지인 김승준 정경운 김은주 김세주
• 간행물 정보: 『신경정신의학』제52권 제3호, 130~142쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 정신과학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.05.31

영문 초록

ObjectivesZZThis study was conducted to examine the reliability and validity of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Korean version (DOCS-K). MethodsZZFifty four individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) completed a battery of measures including the DOCS-K, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Obsessive- Compulsive Inventory-Revised-Korean version (OCI-R-K), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Psychometric properties of the DOCS-K were analyzed. ResultsZZThe Cronbach’s α value for internal consistency of DOCS-K was in excellent range (0.91-0.95). The construct validity was analyzed on the basis of principal component analysis and 4-factor structure of the original scale was maintained. The DOCS-K total and subscale scores were more strongly correlated with those of other OC symptom-specific measures (convergent validity) than those of nonspecific depression or anxiety measures (discriminant validity). The DOCS-K total score was strongly correlated with total scores of Y-BOCS (r=0.64, p<0.01) and OCI-R-K (r=0.71, p<0.01). Correlations between the DOCS-K subscales and corresponding subscales of the OCI-R-K were stronger than correlations with the noncorresponding subscales : 1) DOCS-K Contamination and OCI-R-K Washing (r=0.69), 2) DOCS-K Responsibility and OCIR- K Checking (r=0.54), 3) DOCS-K Unacceptable Thoughts and OCI-R-K Obsessing (r=0.73), 4) DOCS-K Symmetry and OCI-R-K Ordering (r=0.55). ConclusionZZThis study revealed that the DOCS-K has good reliability and validity. Therefore, the DOCS-K can be used as a promising measure of dimensional OC symptoms in Korea.

목차

서 론

방 법

결 과

고 찰

결 론

REFERENCES

키워드

Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Korean version Obsessive-compulsive disorder Reliability Validity