본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

피상속인의 의사해석에 따른민법 제1008조의 해석론

이용수 10

영문명
Interpretation of Article 1008 of the Korean Civil Code according to the Interpretation of the Inheritee’s Intention
발행기관
한국가족법학회
저자명
김창규(Chang Kyu Kim)
간행물 정보
『가족법연구』第38卷 2號, 247~302쪽, 전체 56쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2024.07.31
9,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

Interpreting and applying Article 1008 of the Korean Civil Code (hereinafter referred to as “Article 1008”) as written would result in the property endowment made to the inheritor of the inheritee converging with the statutory inheritance share. The exemption from special benefits adjustment occurs when the intentions of the inheritee differ from the contents stipulated in Article 1008, leading to the exclusion of the application of Article 1008 in accordance with the inheritee’s intentions. I perceived that in cases where a testamentary gift by universal title for the inheritor results in an amount insufficient to meet the statutory inheritance share, thereby causing a modification of the inheritance share, if an inheritor who received a testamentary gift by universal title had also received property transfers such as gifts(excluding a testamentary gift by specific title) during inheritee’s lifetime, it could be inferred that they had already received the testamentary gift by universal title in advance. Thus, Article 1008 could be analogously applied in such cases. Furthermore, I suggest that when a testamentary gift by universal title for the inheritor falls short of the statutory inheritance share, leading to a modification of the inheritance share, in cases where both a testamentary gift by universal title and a testamentary gift by specific title have occurred, or in cases where a property is contributed after the testamentary gift by universal title during the inheritee’s lifetime, all scenarios are governed by the discussion of contradiction of wills. This results in a similar outcome as if Article 1008 were applied. Unless there are provisions in domestic law, such as BGB § 2056, the issue of returning excess special benefits must be viewed from the perspective of exemption from adjustment of special benefits. It is necessary to exercise great caution in recognizing the implicit intention to exempt the return of excessive special benefits in relation to the property contribution exceeding the original inheritance share to the inheritor of the inheritee.

영문 초록

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 제1008조에 대한 기본적인 관점
Ⅲ. 상속인에게 포괄적 유증을 한 경우
Ⅳ. 초과특별수익의 반환 문제
Ⅴ. 결 론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김창규(Chang Kyu Kim). (2024).피상속인의 의사해석에 따른민법 제1008조의 해석론. 가족법연구, 38 (2), 247-302

MLA

김창규(Chang Kyu Kim). "피상속인의 의사해석에 따른민법 제1008조의 해석론." 가족법연구, 38.2(2024): 247-302

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제