학술논문
영문법 학습에 있어서 타동사에 따르는 부정사/동명사의 결속구조
이용수 0
- 영문명
- A Study on the Collocation of the Verb and Infinitive versus Gerund in English Education
- 발행기관
- 한국영어교육연구학회
- 저자명
- 朴魯哲(Noh-cheol Park)
- 간행물 정보
- 『영어교육연구』제31호, 122~144쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 교육학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.10.30
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study, which is based on the verb + infinitive/gerund construction, begins with the following questions :
(1) What are the semantic differences between the infinitive and gerund?
(2) Do verbs have semantic differences regarding future-past dichotomy in consideration of the following grammatical features: the verb 'want' always takes the infinitive as its object, not the gerund, the verb 'enjoy' takes the gerund, not the infinitive, and the verbs 'forget,' 'like,' 'begin', and 'stop' take both the infinitive and the gerund?
(3) If yes, how can the verbs which have certain future and past distinctions be compatible with infinitive and gerund?
In Chapter 2, this study finds that semantic differences the future meaning in (1a) and the past meaning in (1b) comes from the difference in the morphemes 'to' (infinitive) in (1a) and '-ing' (gerund) in (1b). This observation indicates that the infinitive carries the future meaning, whereas the gerund carries the past meaning.
In Chapter 3, this study analyzes many example sentences in which verbs have both infinitive and gerund as their object and concludes that want-class verbs have future-oriented meaning, enjoyclass verbs have past-oriented meaning, and forget-class and likeclass verbs have both future-oriented and past-oriented meanings.
In Chapter 4, this study suggests that to meet the condition of meaning compatibility, want-class verbs, which are regarding as having future meaning, should take infinitive as their object, and enjoy-class verbs with past meaning should take the gerund as their object. However, forget-class, like-class, begin-class and stop-class, which have both future meaning and past meaning, can take as their object both the infinitive and gerund, since the future meaning is compatible only with future-oriented meaning and past meaning is compatible only with past-oriented meaning. The following are examples of the possible combinations of the verbs using both the infinitive and the gerund.
(4a) He wants to smoke.
(4b)*He wants smoking.
(5a)*She enjoys to smoke.
(5b) She enjoys smoking.
(6a) I forgot to smoke.
(6b) I forgot smoking.
(7a) They like to smoke.
(7b) They like smoking.
(8a) He began to borrow money.
(8b) He began borrowing money.
(9a) She stopped to smoke.
(9b) She stopped smoking.
The difference in meaning between the infinitival sentence (5a) and the gerundial sentence (5b) of the verb 'forget' is strict, but the difference in meaning between the infinitival sentence (6a) and the gerundial sentence (6b)of the verb 'like' is vague. There is no meaning difference between (7a) and (7b). In (9), the difference in meaning between (a) and (b) is not based on the future-past dichotomy, so (9) is an exceptional case to this study.
목차
1. 서 론
2. 부정사와 동명사의 의미 속성
3. 동사의 시간적 의미 속성
4. 의미 속성에 따른 동사와 부정사·동명사의 결속
5. 결 론
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- Mixed-Phonics를 통한 효과적인 Phonics 지도방안 연구
- 영어교육연구 제31호 목차
- Listening Comprehension in the Second and Foreign Language Acquisition
- 영문법 학습에 있어서 타동사에 따르는 부정사/동명사의 결속구조
- 비언어적 의사소통에 대한 이해도 조사
- Some Morphological Features of Early Modern English
- 영어 형용사 굴절에 관한 연구
- 변형주어 there의 통사적 특성과 제약
- 초인지 언어교수 전략을 위한 문학 텍스트의 활용
- 영어교육에 있어서 비디오 매체의 활용
- Writing Feedback: Assessing Korean Learners' Viewpoints and Strategies for Dealing with Them
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!