학술논문
확인소송원형관의 현대적 변용
이용수 36
- 영문명
- A Modern Transformation of the Perspective that a Declaratory Remedy is a Basic form or Prototype of All Lawsuit
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 정상민(Sangmin Jung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제28권 제1호, 1~61쪽, 전체 61쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2024.02.28
10,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
In terms of history, it couldn’t be denied that the three type of lawsuit(coercive-, declaratory-, constitutive remedy) were recognized as independent needs in the development process of Civil Procedure, and current practice is also based on the independence between types.
However, the theory that a declaratory remedy is a basic form of all lawsuits is theoretically valid to some extent in that all three types of the above lawsuit confirm the existence of rights and that the effect of the judgment has res judicata.
Although modern and general confirmation litigation was established in Germany in the 19th century, its origins go back to Roman law, and it is a system that has developed in line with the needs of the times. In addition, it is necessary to take into account that in modern society, a declaratory remedy can play more diverse functions and roles in the conflict between various values and interests and the relief of the parties' rights.
As such, if a declaratory remedy is a product of historical development, there is a need to develop and transform it to suit the needs of modern society.
In seeking to expand the scope of relief for the parties' rights and at the same time rationalize the procedure, it is necessary to actively consider that a declaratory remedy is the basic or prototype of all lawsuit. Accordingly, in cases where it is more appropriate to resolve disputes, the responsibility and role of implementation shall be divided and supplemented or replaced. In designing more effective remedies in modern litigation, it is considered desirable to actively utilize the confirmation action as the basic or first step procedure.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 확인소송원형관의 검토
Ⅲ. 법사적·연혁적 검토
Ⅳ. 확인소송의 기능에 대한 재고
Ⅴ. 확인소송원형관의 현대적 변용
Ⅵ. 맺음말
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
- 가상자산(암호화폐 등)의 법적 성질과 민사집행
- 부당한 장래적 판례변경 - 대법원 2024. 12. 19. 선고 2020다247190, 2023다302838 전원합의체 판결
- 소송법상 특별대리인
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
