미국 연방 디스커버리법제상 보존의무에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A Study of the Duty to Preserve under U.S. Discovery Law with a Focus on the Plaintiff
• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 이준범
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제27권 제3호, 131~186쪽, 전체 56쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2023.10.31

영문 초록

There are discussions about introducing a modified U.S.-style discovery to the Korean civil procedure. The discovery research group formed by the Supreme Court Judicial Administration Advisory Committee submitted a report noting the need to clarify when the duty to preserve triggers by amending the Article 350 of the Civil Procedure Act. The proposed amendment imposes a duty to preserve, which states that all parties should not delete related documents when a lawsuit is reasonably expected. Since there is no U.S.-like duty to preserve under the current Korean civil procedure, it is useful to refer to the related jurisprudence of the United States in order to interpret the proposed amendment going forward. This article examines the U.S. federal court precedents on the duty to preserve of the plaintiff, focusing on the trigger of the duty to preserve. Then, I propose that, to make it easier for the public to know when the duty to preserve triggers, examples should be given through specific legislation. Finally, in the United States, a party generally will put in place a litigation hold to fulfill the duty to preserve. Considering that Korean party probably will put in place a similar litigation hold if duty to preserve is triggered, I provide an example of a preservation notice that a plaintiff’s attorney may use to put on a litigation hold when the duty to preserve triggers.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 보존의무에 관한 미국 연방 법리 - 원고를 중심으로

Ⅲ. 한국 민사소송절차상 보존의무도입 시 시사점

Ⅳ. 결론

키워드

보존의무 전자적으로 저장된 정보 전자적 디스커버리 디스커버리 보존조치 Duty to Preserve Electronically Stored Information E-Discovery Discovery Litigation Hold