학술논문
The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea
이용수 16
- 영문명
- The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 공영호
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제27권 제2호, 47~84쪽, 전체 38쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2023.06.30
7,360원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Korean judiciary has been subject to heavy criticism due to the insufficiency of fact-findings at trial. Such lack of fact-findings has been attributed to several factors. First, there is no strong mechanism for evidence- gathering at trial proceedings which tend to bog down with a series of long and ineffective exchange of documents between the parties. Secondly, fact-findings are allowed at appellate courts in Korea so that litigants expect to continue fact-gathering at appellate level, without committing to the complete fact-finding at trial courts. There has been significant debate surrounding the necessity of addressing the issues pertaining to the trial procedures in Korea—especially on the fact-gathering system. As one of the most effective ways to do so, the U.S.-style discovery system has been considered. There are particular features of the U.S. discovery system that the Korean judiciary and the bar have shown a strong inclination towards adopting: party-initiated evidence gathering; prescheduled discovery and trial dates; and mandatory initial disclosures.
However, in order to successfully adopt the U.S.-style discovery system, gaining an understanding of the drawbacks of the U.S. discovery is imperative —adversarial and competitive lawyering in discovery; insufficient judicial roles; problems of mandatory initial disclosure and notice-pleading; and abusive use of discovery. In addition to the analysis of the above problems, this article also discusses the lessons that the Korean judiciary and bar should learn from the American experience before adopting the discovery system. Lastly, it makes several proposals for the Korean judicial reform that can contribute to the successful implementation of the new discovery system.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Current Problems of the Korean Evidence-Gathering System
Ⅲ. Distinctive Features and Current Problems of the U.S. Discovery;Lessons for the Korean Judiciary and Bar
Ⅳ. Proposals for the Korean Judicial Reform
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 민사소송 제27권 제2호 목차
- 소송무능력자에 대한 송달의 효력과 구제방법
- 법원의 중재인선정 재판에 있어서의 심리
- 민사 사법절차(Civil Justice)에서 인공지능의 확장
- 민사전자소송에서 리걸테크의 활용에 관한 연구
- 가사소송법상 사전적 이행확보제도
- 주주대표소송에서 제소청구의 범위와 관련 논점
- ‘원고는 소를 취하하고, 피고는 이에 동의한다’는 내용의 화해권고결정의 효력
- The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!