본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea

이용수 16

영문명
The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
공영호
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제27권 제2호, 47~84쪽, 전체 38쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2023.06.30
7,360

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The Korean judiciary has been subject to heavy criticism due to the insufficiency of fact-findings at trial. Such lack of fact-findings has been attributed to several factors. First, there is no strong mechanism for evidence- gathering at trial proceedings which tend to bog down with a series of long and ineffective exchange of documents between the parties. Secondly, fact-findings are allowed at appellate courts in Korea so that litigants expect to continue fact-gathering at appellate level, without committing to the complete fact-finding at trial courts. There has been significant debate surrounding the necessity of addressing the issues pertaining to the trial procedures in Korea—especially on the fact-gathering system. As one of the most effective ways to do so, the U.S.-style discovery system has been considered. There are particular features of the U.S. discovery system that the Korean judiciary and the bar have shown a strong inclination towards adopting: party-initiated evidence gathering; prescheduled discovery and trial dates; and mandatory initial disclosures. However, in order to successfully adopt the U.S.-style discovery system, gaining an understanding of the drawbacks of the U.S. discovery is imperative —adversarial and competitive lawyering in discovery; insufficient judicial roles; problems of mandatory initial disclosure and notice-pleading; and abusive use of discovery. In addition to the analysis of the above problems, this article also discusses the lessons that the Korean judiciary and bar should learn from the American experience before adopting the discovery system. Lastly, it makes several proposals for the Korean judicial reform that can contribute to the successful implementation of the new discovery system.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Current Problems of the Korean Evidence-Gathering System
Ⅲ. Distinctive Features and Current Problems of the U.S. Discovery;Lessons for the Korean Judiciary and Bar
Ⅳ. Proposals for the Korean Judicial Reform
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

공영호. (2023).The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea. 민사소송, 27 (2), 47-84

MLA

공영호. "The Ramifications in Implementing the U.S.-Style Discovery System To Enhance Evidence-Gathering in Korea." 민사소송, 27.2(2023): 47-84

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제