학술논문
신탁통치제도의 국제법적 고찰
이용수 116
- 영문명
- A Study on the Trusteeship System under International Law
- 발행기관
- 국제법평론회
- 저자명
- 이서희(Lee, Seo Hee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『국제법평론』제63호, 107~139쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2022.10.31
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This article attempted to critically examine the trusteeship system established based on the UN Charter. Furthermore, it intended to clarify whether the trusteeship system contributed to overcoming the decolonization of international law. To this end, it examined the process of transferring the mandate system to the trusteeship system as the League of Nations was dissolved. In addition, it identified implications of the trusteeship system by reviewing the obligations under sacred trust for civilization and submitting a petition and objective of the trusteeship system.
An overall review of the trusteeship system shows that it was established by modifying and supplementing the shortcomings of the mandate system. The trusteeship system stipulated the open-door policy in the UN Charter, which aimed at international peace, security, and economic peace, and tried to grant nationality and rights to the peoples of the trust territories. Therefore, it can be evaluated that the trusteeship system showed greater efforts to overcome colonialism under international law than the mandate system in the past.
However, according to the judgments associated with South West Africa and certain phosphate lands in the Nauru cases, the authorities for administration violated their obligations within the trusteeship system. First, it was confirmed through the Northern Cameroon case that the obligations of mandate powers, which were confirmed in the previous mandate system, were maintained in the trusteeship system. Second, in phosphate lands in the Nauru case, the ICJ confirmed that the violation of the mandate's obligations, which began in the mandate system, continued in the trusteeship system. Finally, in the case pertaining to South West Africa, the ICJ stated that the violation of the mandate's obligations, which began in the mandate system, continued in the UN system.
Through this study, it can be seen that while the trusteeship system contributed to overcoming the decolonization of international law, the violation of obligations of the mandate powers continued in both the UN system and the trusteeship system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 유엔헌장상 신탁통치제도
Ⅲ. 시정당국의 의무 위반 사례분석
Ⅳ. 결 론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- WTO SPS협정상 지역화에 관한 연구
- 니카라과-콜롬비아 간 카리브해에서의 주권적 권리 및 해역 침해 주장 사건 평석
- 자동차세 개정안의 한미 FTA 제2장 위반 가능성에 관한 고찰
- Ethnic Cleansing as a Distinct Crime under International Law: Assessing the Case of Forcible Transfer of Ethnic Koreans in the Former USSR(1937)
- 국제해양법재판소의 2019년 M/V “Norstar”호 사건 본안 판결에 대한 국제법적 분석
- 신탁통치제도의 국제법적 고찰
- The Enrica Lexie Incident 판정과 함의
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!