Derivation of [XP-NUN?] Revisited: Reply to Park (2021)

• 영문명: Derivation of [XP-NUN?] Revisited: Reply to Park (2021)
• 발행기관: 현대문법학회
• 저자명: Daeho Chung
• 간행물 정보: 『현대문법연구』제115호, 51~76쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.09.30

영문 초록

Daeho Chung. 2022. Derivation of [XP-NUN?] Revisited: Reply to Park (2021). Studies in Modern Grammar 115, 51-76. Contra Chung’s (2021a) contrastive topic (CT) movement analysis of the so-called contrastive topic fragment (CTF) of the form [XP-NUN?], Park (2021) claims the following: (i) The pre-NUN remnant can be a contrastive focus (CF) (as well as a CT); (ii) the CTF is derived from a cleft-like wh-construction with ettehkey ‘how’ in the pivot; and (iii) the remnants undergo scrambling. This paper makes the following three points: (i) given the generally accepted definitions of topic, the pre-NUN element behaves like a CT, as suggested in Chung (2021a); (ii) Park’s cleft-like construction based derivation faces non-trivial problems, especially with respect to the available interpretation of the CTF; and (iii) Park’s generalized question [XP-NUN etteh/ettehkey ‘how’ ...?] can in fact be viewed as a derived structure due to a clausal replacement by etteh/ettehkey, analogous to the kuleh/kulehkey replacement entertained in Park (2013) and Sohn (2019).

키워드

contrastive topic (CT) contrastive topic fragment (CTF) ellipsis remnant replacement