判決의 片面的 對世效와 必須的 共同訴訟-대법원 2021. 7. 22. 선고 2020다284977 전원합의체 판결

• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 姜求旭
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제26권 제2호, 177~219쪽, 전체 43쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.06.30

영문 초록

In this paper, I examined whether co-litigation, such as administrative litigation, household litigation, and company-related litigation applied or applied mutatis mutandis to the text of Article 190 of the Commercial Act, constitutes a (similar) indispensable co-litigation, and drew a conclusion to disagree with it. In addition, I considered the issue of “the status of an indispensable co-litigant, not appealed or not been filed an appeal by the counter party in the procedure of appeal” which is one of the old points of controversy over indispensable co-litigation, and presented my opinion. The essence of my opinion is that if the provisions of Article 67 (1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act are interpreted and applied as they are, such co-litigants acquire the status of the appellant or the appellee, so they can make all necessary arguments in the proceedings of the Court of Appeal.

목차

【事實關係의 槪要】

【事件의 經過】

【硏究】

. 緖論 主題 設定

. 本論 檢討

1. 類似必須的 共同訴訟

2. 判決의 片面的 對世效

. 補論

1. 問題 상소를 제기하지 않았거

나 상소가 제기되지 않은 필수적

공동소송인의 상소심 소송절차상

지위

2. 檢討

. 結論

키워드

필수적 공동소송(indispensable co-litigation) 유사필수적 공동소송(similar indispensable co-litigation) 판결의 효력(effect of an judgment) 기판력(Res Judicata) 대세적 효력(effect to the third party) 편면적 효력(one-sided effect)