본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

캅카스 지역의 민족-언어상황 고찰

이용수 11

영문명
A Study on Ethno-Language Situation in Caucasia: Focusing on Language Policies in South Ossetia and North Ossetia-Alania
발행기관
한국슬라브어학회
저자명
정경택(Chung, Kyung Taek)
간행물 정보
『슬라브어 연구』제21권 제2호, 133~152쪽, 전체 20쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 기타인문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.10.30
5,200

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

After the dissolution of Soviet Union in 1991, the 14 former states of Soviet Union established a number of titular˗oriented language policies in order to strive for their ethno-nationalistic identities. For example, 3 Baltic states with their firmly defined ethnic identities conducted relatively more solid nation˗building processes than the other former Soviet states. However, the rest of former Soviet countries including the Central Asia and Caucasus have been threatened by ethnic disputes, and especially Georgia, which has a long history of its people and language, encounters severe ethnic conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia due to Georgia˗centered nation˗building policies. Although the official status of Russian language was successfully deprived of the implementation of Georgian national development programs after its independence, this caused the resistance of South Ossetian people and they eventually declared their independence. As a result, a reunification with the Republic of north Ossetia-Alania in the Russian Federation can be expected. However, the language policies and situations in South Ossetia and North Ossetia in Russian Federation are different from each other. North Ossetia within the Russian Federation remains as an autonomous republic that could declare both Ossetian and Russian as their official languages, but the use of Russian language is much more dominant than that of Ossetian. In contrast, South Ossetia which was an autonomous oblast’ in Georgia and currently is an independent country, is found to be active for conserving and expanding the use of their titular language. Therefore, it has been a challenge for the two Ossetian governments to create a single Ossetian language with narrowing the differences between the two dialects: Iron and Digor. This will be the first step for them to protect their titular language from the influences of Russian and Georgian governments and their languages.

목차

1. 서론
2. 본론
3. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정경택(Chung, Kyung Taek). (2016).캅카스 지역의 민족-언어상황 고찰. 슬라브어 연구, 21 (2), 133-152

MLA

정경택(Chung, Kyung Taek). "캅카스 지역의 민족-언어상황 고찰." 슬라브어 연구, 21.2(2016): 133-152

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제