학술논문
「廣寒樓記」 評批 분석(1)
이용수 4
- 영문명
- Analysis of the Critical Commentary of Gwanghanru-gi -Soeom-juin s Preface and Reading-
- 발행기관
- 동방한문학회
- 저자명
- 鄭吉秀(Chung, Kil-soo)
- 간행물 정보
- 『동방한문학』제36호, 1~18쪽, 전체 18쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.09.30
4,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Gwanghanru-gi廣寒樓記 is an adaptation in classical Chinese from Chunhyang-jeon, Korean classical novel, written by Susan水山 in the mid of 19th century. This work was noted in that it had a critical commentary評批, which was a unique way of criticism in the Middle ages of East Asia. As the main critic of Gwanghanru-gi is Soeom-juin小广主人, I analyzed Soeom-juin s preface and way of reading in the critical commentary of Gwanghanru-gi. After I analyzed Soeom-juin s preface, I could not help recognizing that Soeom-juin had a poor understanding about Hsihsiang-chi西廂記 and the drama or the novel in China. Though Soeom-juin asserted that Gwanghanru-gi was superior to Hsihsiang-chi, he had no ability of comparing Gwanghanru-gi with Hsihsiang-chi because he read not Hsihsiang-chi but Yingying-zhuan鶯鶯傳, which was a basis of Hsihsiang-chi. Meanwhile, most of Soeom-juin s way of reading was the imitation or variation of Jin Shengtan金聖嘆 s critical commentary on Hsihsiang-chi. Therefore I concluded that Soeom-juin s critical commentary, as far as about preface and reading, was built on the superficial view with a lack of profound understanding about Hsihsiang-chi and Jin Shengtan s criticism.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 「廣寒樓記」의 序文 분석
3. 「廣寒樓記」의 讀法 분석
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!