본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

三虞와 卒哭의 同異에 대한 小考

이용수 0

영문명
Similarities and Differences between Samwoo(三虞) and Jolgock(卒哭) : An Exploratory Study
발행기관
동방한문학회
저자명
李霜芽(Lee, Sang-ah)
간행물 정보
『동방한문학』제59호, 1~17쪽, 전체 17쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2014.06.30
4,840

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Samwoo(三虞) and Jolgock(卒哭) are two kinds of proprieties of mourning decorums. In conventional thinking people have viewed these proprieties as separate memorial ceremonies. This viewpoint was derived from the interpretation of Li Jing(禮經) by Jeong Hyun(鄭玄) of the Later Han Dynasty and thus overturned the existing conventional idea. However, O Gyegong(敖繼公) of Yüan Dynasty insisted that Samwoo(三虞) and Jolgock(卒哭) were the same memorial ceremonies which commemorate the same day. Raising questions of the Jeong Hyun(鄭玄)’s interpretation it continued to provoke controversy at the peak of the Ching Dynasty. There were; however, a few scholars in the Joseon Dynasty who insisted that the two ceremonies were the same.The purpose of this paper is to examine the cause of the controversy and inquire if the bases of the two sides are valid respectively. First of all, I examined the primary meaning of Samwoo(三虞) and Jolgock(卒哭) based on the original text. Then I illuminated how China and the Joseon Dynasty understood the similarities and the differences of Samwoo(三虞) and Jolgock(卒哭) and investigated the weakness of the two theories. Finally, I found that current arguments were derived not from the base of Li Jing(禮經) but instead were based on the various interpretations of the book. Therefore, I propose that the conventional idea of viewing the two ceremonies differently is not an immutable theory. Besides, the identical theory can be embraced and arrives at a common view when the majority approve that the interpretation of the original book. As a result, the ritual can also be changed following the new viewpoint. We hardly have conclusive evidence but I find that the ancient interpretation before Jeong Hyun(鄭玄) which considered the two ceremonies as the same seems to be more natural to spite the pros and cons respectively.

목차

1. 문제제기
2. 虞와 卒哭의 原義
3. 삼우 졸곡 부동설
4. 삼우 졸곡 동일설
5. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

李霜芽(Lee, Sang-ah). (2014).三虞와 卒哭의 同異에 대한 小考. 동방한문학, (59), 1-17

MLA

李霜芽(Lee, Sang-ah). "三虞와 卒哭의 同異에 대한 小考." 동방한문학, .59(2014): 1-17

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제