본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

容齋 李荇의 屈原 수용과 문학적 변용

이용수 2

영문명
Acceptance of Literature of Qu Yuan(屈原) and Changes in Aspects of Literature of Yongjae(容齋) Lee Haeng(李荇)- Tension and Coexistance in Identification and Distance -
발행기관
동방한문학회
저자명
金保京(Kim, Bo-kyeong)
간행물 정보
『동방한문학』제56호, 1~26쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2013.09.30
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This paper explored the characteristics in acceptance of literature of Qu Yuan and aspects of changes through literature of Yongjae Lee Haeng(1478~1534) who represents his time based on the decision that Purge of Literati was a turning point to accept Qu Yuan. Lee Haeng was involved in Gapja(甲子) Purge and lived in Chungju(忠州), Haman(咸安), and Geojaedo in exile for three years. He published three collections of his poems written in exile. The collections contain about 30 works which accept Qu Yuan. The only prose titled <離騷後拔> advocates Qu Yuan, representing the view of the person who suffered the purge. Also, in his poetry, he would sympathize with Qu Yuan by inviting his own gloom. In the entire work, he would materialize the internal world or atmosphere of Qu Yuan and his works. In terms of qualitative performance, the latter excels. On the other hand, his works consistently show a certain attitude to distance from Qu Yuan. His poetry may declare the ‘difference’ from Qu Yuan and use a parody to create the opposite meaning. The freshness of the message or personality in literature literary are more prominent in the works than those of identification. The identification and distance are selective, rather than contradictory, in orientation. He was in sufficient sympathy with loyalty, respect for the king, and good politics. However, Lee Haeng did not agree to the situation where Qu Yuan fought the world intensively and chose to kill himself to disappear. At least, he did not choose the latter way. As for the former, there appears complete identification of Lee Haeng with Qu Yuan. In the latter, there is complete differentiation from Qu Yuan. The most important characteristic is that the two attitudes coexist in tension. While the works of art by Lee Haeng, collected through acceptance of Qu Yuan work as a pioneer to raise questions of the day, there are personal characteristics and attitudes in life, creating unique literature. Especially, if you focus on the ‘difference’ from Qu Yuan, you will understand the conditions where he becomes a new meritorious subject upon return with King Jungjong( 中宗). The works by Lee Haeng through acceptance of Qu Yuan are unique among the literati during the purge period and ensure a meaningful position in the history of literature by those in political exile.

목차

1. 서언: 조선전기와 굴원․『초사』
2. 굴원에 대한 이해와 동일화
3. 굴원과의 거리 두기와 지향의 차별화
4. 결언: 이행 굴원 수용의 특성과 의의
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

金保京(Kim, Bo-kyeong). (2013).容齋 李荇의 屈原 수용과 문학적 변용. 동방한문학, (56), 1-26

MLA

金保京(Kim, Bo-kyeong). "容齋 李荇의 屈原 수용과 문학적 변용." 동방한문학, .56(2013): 1-26

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제