본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

국제형사재판에서 사면의 효력

이용수 138

영문명
Amnesties in International Criminal Courts/Tribunals: Jurisdictional Bases of Courts/Tribunals and the Opposability of Amnesties
발행기관
국제법평론회
저자명
이혜영(Lee, Hyeyoung)
간행물 정보
『국제법평론』제60호, 125~165쪽, 전체 41쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2021.10.30
7,720

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In a March 2020 decision, the Appeal Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) stated that “international law is still in the development stage on the question of acceptability of amnesties.” This decision caused controversy over whether it is appropriate for the ICC to decide the legality of national amnesty law. It has been argued that the question of legality of amnesties under international law is different from the question of their opposability to international criminal courts/tribunals, and it would be more appropriate for international criminal courts/tribunals to only decide the opposability of amnesties to international courts/tribunals. International criminal courts/tribunals are not established to adjudicate the legality of acts of States under international law. They are established to prosecute individuals who committed international crimes and, thus, their pronouncements on the legality of acts of States could be ultra vires. A question, therefore, arises as to whether international criminal courts/tribunals have capacity and authority to make decisions on the legality of amnesties adopted by States. In addition, while international criminal courts/tribunals have decided on the matter outside the scope of its mandates, they have failed to provide concrete criteria for determining whether amnesties, irrespective of their legality under international law, are opposable to international criminal courts/tribunals. With this background in mind, this article reviews different jurisdictional bases of existing international criminal courts/tribunals, and how courts/tribunals have dealt with legal effects of amnesties differently. This articles then identifies the issues that are, in fact, relevant for international criminal courts/tribunals—whether amnesties, irrespective of their legality, are opposable to international criminal courts/tribunals.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 현재까지 동향: 재판소의 설립근거 유형별 검토
Ⅲ. 대안적 논의 검토
Ⅳ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이혜영(Lee, Hyeyoung). (2021).국제형사재판에서 사면의 효력. 국제법평론, (60), 125-165

MLA

이혜영(Lee, Hyeyoung). "국제형사재판에서 사면의 효력." 국제법평론, .60(2021): 125-165

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제