본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

의약품부작용보고 원시자료에서 소비자와 의료 전문가 간의 이상사례 보고 비교 연구

이용수 2

영문명
The Comparison of Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting between Consumers and Healthcare Professionals using Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) Database
발행기관
한국보건사회약료경영학회
저자명
채지인(Ji-In Chae) 백연희(Yeon-Hee Baek) 전하림(Ha-Lim Jeon) 이의경(Eui-Kyung Lee) 신주영(Ju-Young Shin)
간행물 정보
『한국보건사회약료경영학회지』제6권 제1호, 31~37쪽, 전체 7쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 기타의약학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2017.11.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

BACKGROUNDS In reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), healthcare professionals including doctors, pharmacists and nurses make up the biggest roles whereas consumers were limited to spontaneous adverse event reporting. However, consumer reports have been gradually recognized as an important source of pharmacovigilance by providing unreported symptoms in traditional healthcare professional reports. OBJECTIVE To compare ADRs reported by consumers with ADRs reported by healthcare professionals, in terms of seriousness of event, types of symptoms and medications involved. METHODS ADRs reported to KAERS (Korea Adverse Event Reporting System) in 2014-2015 was analyzed according to source of report, seriousness of symptom, type of ADRs categorized by SOC (system organ class) and the majorly reported medications coded by ATC (anatomical therapeutic chemical). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for reporting serious ADRs by consumer was calculated as compared with healthcare professionals. RESULTS Consumer reports corresponded to 9.7% of ADR reports, among a total of 286,274 reports from 2014 to 2015. Consumer reports accounted for higher proportion in the reports of female (60.4%) and patients of aged between 28 days and 24 months (21.1%) as compared with healthcare professional reports. Consumers reported serious ADRs more than twice as compared with healthcare professionals (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.19-2.42). In serious ADRs, significant difference was shown in the frequency of major symptoms and major medications involved between consumer reports and healthcare professional reports. CONCLUSION This study found significant difference between consumer and healthcare reports in its proportion of categories including gender, major symptoms and medications.

목차

서 론
연구방법
연구결과
고찰 및 결론
감사의 글(Acknowledgement)
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

채지인(Ji-In Chae),백연희(Yeon-Hee Baek),전하림(Ha-Lim Jeon),이의경(Eui-Kyung Lee),신주영(Ju-Young Shin). (2017).의약품부작용보고 원시자료에서 소비자와 의료 전문가 간의 이상사례 보고 비교 연구. 한국보건사회약료경영학회지, 6 (1), 31-37

MLA

채지인(Ji-In Chae),백연희(Yeon-Hee Baek),전하림(Ha-Lim Jeon),이의경(Eui-Kyung Lee),신주영(Ju-Young Shin). "의약품부작용보고 원시자료에서 소비자와 의료 전문가 간의 이상사례 보고 비교 연구." 한국보건사회약료경영학회지, 6.1(2017): 31-37

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제