한국과 독일의 중재판례 비교연구

• 영문명: A Comparative study on the jurisprudence in arbitration in Korea and Germany
• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 정선주(Jeong, Sun Ju)
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제20권 제2호, 9~44쪽, 전체 36쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2016.11.30

영문 초록

Nowadays many countries are globally concentrating their effort such as vitalizing the arbitration system as an most efficient alternative dispute resolution and amending the arbitration law to emerge their country as an attractive international place of arbitration. Both Korea and Germany are no exception to this trend. But to vitalize the arbitration system and to be the key role in international arbitration, the attitude of precedent toward the arbitration system has deep significance as well as the legislative effort. Though various legislation has been devised to encourage the arbitration system, there’ll be many limitation to select arbitration instead of litigation or to choose Korea as an arbitration place when the court’s application and interpretation of the law is negative or passive. Therefore the review of which the court’s arbitration practice should make a progress to advance our arbitration system is necessary. To solve the problem, we took an objective on the actual implication to develop our arbitration practice by comparing with the German’s practice which is very similar to ours in the view of legal fabric, court system and the main part of judicial process. Although regarding the document requirements in arbitration agreement, both countries’legal practice show pro-arbitral attitude in all, it is necessary to change our court’s negative stand on optional arbitration agreement or arbitration procedural illegal declaratory claim. In addition, as the court hasn’t made the decision on arbitrability of the subject-matter of a dispute in Corporate Litigation yet, we should consider it positively referring to the case of German legal practice.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며

Ⅱ. 중재합의의 서면성

Ⅲ. 중재절차 등에 관한 합의가 없는 경우 중재합의의 효력

Ⅳ. 선택적 중재합의

Ⅴ. 파산과 중재합의

Ⅵ. 회사관계사건의 중재적격

Ⅶ. 중재절차 위법확인청구

Ⅷ. 중재판정의 효력 - 집행력

Ⅸ. 중재신청을 각하한 중재판정과 중재판정취소의 소

Ⅹ. 마치며

참고문헌

키워드

중재합의의 서면성 뉴욕협약 선택적 중재합의 회사관계사건의 중재적격 중재판정의 집행력 document requirements in arbitration agreement New York Convention optional arbitration agreement arbitrability of the subject-matter of a dispute in Corporate Litigation enforcement of arbitral award