인터넷상 저작권침해와 국제재판관할권

• 영문명: Copyright Infringement on the Internet and International Jurisdiction – Comparison of the rulings of the CJEU and the D.C. District Court and its implications to Korea –
• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 이주연(Lee, Ju Yoen)
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제21권 제2호, 89~132쪽, 전체 44쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.11.30

영문 초록

In Pinckney v. Mediatech (2013) and Hejduk v. Energieagentur (2015), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that jurisdiction in copyright infringement on the Internet depends on the accessibility of website content. While the U.S. Supreme Court has not decided on the same issue, many U.S. Courts of Appeals and District Courts have ruled in cases including Triple Up v. Youku Tudou (2017) that mere accessibility of a foreign website is not a sufficient ground for jurisdiction of the U.S. courts. To be specific, jurisdiction in copyright infringement on the Internet depends on the interactivity of the foreign website or whether the website is purposefully directed toward the forum state. In comparing the different approaches adopted by the CJEU and many U.S. courts in terms of foreseeability, litigation efficiency, remedies available to the plaintiff, forum shopping, inconvenience on the international defendant, and business implications, this study concludes that the CJEU’s approach is more appropriate in the Korean context.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 유럽사법재판소의 Pinckney 사건 판결과 Hejduk 사건 판결

Ⅲ. 미국 워싱턴DC 연방지방법원의 Youku 사건 판결

Ⅳ. 유럽사법재판소 판결과 미국 하급심 법원 판결에 대한 평가와 시사점

Ⅴ. 결 어

참고문헌

키워드

인터넷상 저작권침해 국제재판관할 Pinckney 사건 판결 Hejduk 사건 판결 Youku 사건 판결 Copyright Infringement on the Internet International Jurisdiction Pinckney v. Mediatech Hejduk v. Energieagentur Triple Up v. Youku Tudou