학술논문
칸토어 ‘무한’(無限)과의 비교를 통해 본 원효 ‘부정’(不定)의 교육학적 의미
이용수 22
- 영문명
- The educational meaning of Wonhyo ‘indeterminate’ through comparison with Cantor ‘Infinite’
- 발행기관
- 한국교육철학회
- 저자명
- 이치형(Lee Chi-Hyung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『교육철학』敎育哲學 第75集, 35~56쪽, 전체 22쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 교육학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2020.06.30
5,440원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this article is to draw educational implications by comparing and examining the infiniteness of Cantor, especially the practical concept and the denial of Wonhyo, that is, the indeterminate concept. Cantor presented the transfinite number that can be treated as a closed system like a number, away from the potential infinite concept that has been going on since Aristotle, and based on this, it presented the concept of practical limit based on the size comparison in infinity. Here, an unresolved paradox of continuum hypothesis occurs, which is called Cantor s paradox, which cantor failed to solve and eventually continued his unhappy life. In contrast, Wonhyo also faced an infinite problem, a paradox, but he concluded it as a ‘negative’ of ‘indetermination’ and lived a life of positivity. This fundamental difference should be seen as the fact that his logic based on his ‘One mind’, which thoroughly carried out the area of intuition in the face of the limitations of inferential thought, worked, and this is differentiated from Cantor. Through this comparative study, this study tried to suggest the meaning of inferential thinking in educational sense and intuitive thinking to supplement it.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 무한과 부정
Ⅲ. ‘무한과 부정’의 비교 고찰
Ⅳ. 결론: 교육적 의의
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!