[연구논문] 마태오 릿치와 탁사 최병헌의 보유론(補儒論)적 기독교 이해의 차이와 한계

• 발행기관: 한신대학교 신학사상연구소
• 저자명: 이정배
• 간행물 정보: 『신학사상』신학사상 2003년 가을호(제122집), 82~109쪽, 전체 28쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 기독교신학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2003.09.01

영문 초록

This is a comparative study between two theologians, M Ricci' s and Choi Byunghun' s(崔炳憲).understanding of Confucianism. M. Ricci was the first Catholic missionary in China and wrote the famous book 『天主實義』. In this book, M. Ricci brought his positive interpretation of classicai Confucianism in the point of Catholic theology. For him, Catholic 天主 is not different from Confucian 上帝. Choi Byunghun wrote the book 『萬宗一巒』 as the first theologian in Korea. In this book he also evaluated positively the Confucianism. He tried to understand Christian truth based on his Confucian experience. He said. "東洋之天卽西洋之天", because he believed that all religions have almost the same taste. In addition to this, these two thinkers agreed with each other in the point that Christian truth will accomplish the Confucianism(補儒論). However, they were different in the way to reach these common result. As a Catholic missionary M. Ricci used the framework of thomistic natural theology in order to read Confucian Texts. But the protestant pastor, Choi Byunghun started to make dialogue in terms of Christology. In fact, 『天主實義』 had not reference to Christology. In this artic1e I will try to show that Choi's attempt will be more sustainable for the Confucian-christian dialogue. However, I also will criticize Choi's 補儒論 and point out the limitation of his understanding of Neoconfucianism. It is the reason that I believe the cosmology of Neo-confucianism can make an appeal for a paradigm change of Christian theology.

목차

Abstract

들어가는 글

1. 인문학적 동서 문명 교류자로서의 릿치와 최병헌

2. 유교와 그리스도교의 연속성 문제 : "上帝 卽天主와 東洋之天 卽西洋之天"

3. 릿치의 『천주실의』와 최병헌의 『만종일연』의 내용비교 - 신중심적 보편주의와 기독론 중심의 보편주의

4. 마태오 릿치와 최병헌의 보유론적 유교 이해의 의미와 한계

참고문헌