Non-finite VP ellipsis, Clefts, and Phase

• 발행기관: 한국생성문법학회
• 저자명: Sun Woong Kim
• 간행물 정보: 『생성문법연구』제29권 제1호, 45~59쪽, 전체 15쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.02.28

영문 초록

The present paper proposes that the well-known difference between ECM to vs. control to distinction with respect to VP ellipsis can be nicely explained under the theory of dynamic phasehood as it relates to ellipsis. Previous research tried to derive the ECM to vs. control to distinction with VP ellipsis either with syntactic agreement or with non-syntactic notions like prosody. Although the present paper does not have much to say about the latter, the former analysis is shown to be deficient and under-motivated. The proposed analysis of this paper can account for two more related observations: the multiple auxiliary effect and the relationship between verb types and extraction out of VP ellipsis. In a nutshell, the dynamic phasehood-based solution is shown to provide a better explanation of the difference of the two instances of infinitival to and be fruitfully extended to cover further empirical domain.

목차

1. Introduction

2. Dynamic Phase-based Solution

3. Possible Extensions

4. Conclusion

References

키워드

VP ellipsis ECM control cleft phase