학술논문
Concepts of Conquest and Occupation: Different views of the Muslim rule in Iberian Peninsula
이용수 14
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국이슬람학회
- 저자명
- Mona Farouk M. Ahmed
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국이슬람학회논총』제29권 1호, 65~104쪽, 전체 40쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 종교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2019.02.28
7,600원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In the past era, earlier before establishing the modern international law and the United Nations, both conquest and military occupation were worldwide happening all over the world. This includes the period of the existence of Islamic power in the Iberian Peninsula, which some describe as an occupation of other countries territories, while others describe it as a conquest for those territories. However, the word ‘conquest’ almost disappeared on
describing wars for long time but reappeared in some news about wars of recent era, while the word ‘occupation’ continued and did not disappear from our modern world.
Approaching the two concepts and explaining the similarity and difference between them can clarify the indications of applying each concept and the intentions behind this.
In Arabic language, the language of Muslims holy book of Quran, the indication for the two concepts of ‘conquest’ and ‘occupation’ is totally different, in a way that many arguments can arouse to prove which of the two concepts give the right description for some cases. However, both of the two concepts have similarity in meaning on the point
that both of them refer to an action using the force (usually military force) to control another country. In Arabic the difference indications of the two concepts is very obvious to show that one has a positive meaning and the other implies a negative sense of hostility. This can be clear seeing that the Arabic word for conquest (fatḥ فتح ) is only
used to express Muslim rule of other countries, while the Arabic word for occupation (iḥtilāl) is used to describe foreign rule for Muslim countries. In this sense, there are Arabic writings defending the Muslim rule of Iberian Peninsula (Andalusia) calling it conquest and refuse to call it occupation.
This paper will try to discuss the difference between these two concepts (conquest, occupation), and on the other hand, it will try to apply these terms onto the case of Muslim rule in Iberian Peninsula, to determine whether it was a conquest or an occupation for the territories.
목차
Introduction
Ⅰ. Definition of Conquest
Ⅱ. Definition of Occupation
Ⅲ. Difference between the two concepts
Ⅳ. Views of the Muslim rule of Iberian Peninsula
Ⅴ. Conclusion
해당간행물 수록 논문
- ISIS이후 아랍세계의 변화와 이슬람포비아 (Islamophobia) 현상에 대한 고찰
- 한국 주요 수출품목의 GCC 시장 내 수출경쟁력 분석
- Concepts of Conquest and Occupation: Different views of the Muslim rule in Iberian Peninsula
- 제정러시아말기 카자흐지식인공동체의 대외 및 대내 변화요인과 변화과정
- The Prospects of Political Islam and State Policy in Central Asia: Ideologies, Movements and Transformations
- Sharī‘ah 해석의 현대이론
- 동예루살렘에 대한 유대교·무슬림·기독교 공동체간 갈등 및 경쟁 구조 분석 -이스라엘 점령체제를 중심-
참고문헌
관련논문
인문학 > 종교학분야 NEW
- 관계중심 예배로의 패러다임 전환을 위한 신학적 고찰
- 저스틴 마터(Justin Matyr)의 ‘그리스도 이전의 그리스도인’에 대한 개혁주의적 재평가
- 토마스 아퀴나스의 아리스토텔레스 정치사상의 수용과 ‘개인’에 대한 담론의 가능성
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!