輸入自由化의 效果分析 및 輸入政策 方向

• 영문명: A Study on the Effects of Trade Liberalization and Import Policy
• 발행기관: 건국대학교 경제경영연구소
• 저자명: Yong Deuk Cho(趙龍得) Seok Koo Lee(李錫求)
• 간행물 정보: 『상경연구』제11권, 111~159쪽, 전체 49쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1986.09.10

영문 초록

Import liberalization in Korea started on the April 1967 when Korea participated in the GATT and positive list trade control system was transformed into the negative list system. Then, the substantial trade liberalization started on May 1978. During the period 1978~1983, the liberalization had winded three times and the width of the liberalization has been gradually increased. The ratio of the liberalization was 84% in 1984, it will be 90% in 1986, and will be 95% in 1988. If a economy satisfies the conditions that domestic firms have competitive power and B.O.P. is in surplus, import liberalization would have economic effects as follows. Resources allocation would be optimal in terms of comparative advantage. Economy would have a competing power and firms may have a technical innovation. And then consumer can have a variety of commodity. Korean economy does not sufficiently satisfy above conditions, but satisfy closely to the conditions. So import liberalization in Korea may provide the following economic effects. First, government-oriented economic system may be transformed into the private-oriented. Private-oriented economic system make the activation of the market mechanism and then support to achieve the efficient distribution of resources and the competitive power of domestic firms. Especially the activation of the market mechanism would eliminate the dual-economy system which made disequilibrium between the large and the medium and small industry. Second, the liberalization gives domestic firms a technical innovation by means of inducing the high-technology and grow the competitive power of domestic industries. In fact, Korean government have protected domestic firms excessively. This results in the inefficient distribution of resources and this is obstacle to improve competitive power of domestic firms. Third, consumers improve their welfare by the liberalization because of the width of their choice. The protection policy supports producer by the sacrifices of the consumer. Fourth, import liberalization in Korea and her trading partner expands the equilibrium of trade. Since a trade between countries is a kind of game, the expansion of import through the liberalization from one country increases the possilibity of export to that country. For example, the liberalization of import from U.S.A. makes us increase export to U.S.A. On the other hand, in some industries a competitive power of domestic firms are not sufficient to compete to that of foreign firms. Also, as some domestic export industries depend on imported goods in production, exports of thoseindustries links to import level/ Especially, the consumer’s preference to the foreign goods is comparatively high. Therefore, expansion of liberalization may have negative effects such as increasing deficit of the B.O.P. in Korea. The deficit of B.O.P. increase the level of foreign debt. So Korea should take the effective import policies to minimize the negative effects and maximize positive effects through liberalization. They are as the followings. First, the absolute advantage items is price and quality are liberalized. But the other items should be delayed because of the protection of the domestic industry. Second, the industrial structure should be reorganized to improve managerial skill and the competing power. Third, R&D should be increased to substitute imported goods in production process to domestic goods. Fourth, the liberalizing items should be monopolizing items. Because monopolizing large scale firms have already competing power. But the small firms haven’t the power yet. Therefore the specialization and linkage between small and large firms of the small industry are needed. Fifth, the government should promote a quality control of domestic goods, R&D investment for new products. If the quality of the domestic goods is inferior, consumers prefer to the foreign ones. Sixth, to achieve the effective liberalization policy, government shoul

목차

Ⅰ. 輸入自由化의 推進背景과 經濟的 效果

Ⅱ. 主要國의 輸入自由化 展開過程과 特徵

Ⅲ. 우리나라의 輸入自由化 推進現況과 特徵

Ⅳ. 우리나라 輸入自由化의 肯定的 效果

Ⅴ. 우리나라 輸入自由化의 否定的 效果

Ⅵ. 輸入自由化의 效率性 提高와 輸入政策의 方向

Ⅶ. 要約 및 結論

參考文獻

SUMMARY