2015년 공학교육인증평가의 미흡 판정 사유 분석:

• 영문명: The Analysis of the Causes for Weakness on the Basis of the 2015 Accreditation Review Findings by the EAC : Focused on the Criterion 3 Curriculum
• 발행기관: 한국공학교육학회
• 저자명: 강상희(Kang, Sang Hee) 송동주(Song, Dong Joo) 김종화(Kim, Jong Hwa) 이강우(Lee, Kang woo)
• 간행물 정보: 『공학교육연구』제20권 제1호, 28~44쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 공학 > 공학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.01.31

영문 초록

This paper deals with analyzing accreditation findings and the causes for the Weakness in the review by the EAC(Engineering Accreditation Committee) of ABEEK in 2015. As results of accreditation review by the EAC and CAC of ABEEK, Weakness findings were 697 cases which made up 56.94% of total findings. Deficiency and Weakness are considered to have been resolved only when the correction or revision has been implemented. The criterion which has the most Weakness findings in the 2015 accreditation review was the criterion 3 Curriculum. By the way the variety and quantity of the Weakness findings are so huge that the analysis of the causes for Weakness findings is focused on the Criterion 3 Curriculum. The findings on program accreditation are made on the basis of the Accreditation Actions Guide. Accordingly in view of formal logic in the accreditation review, the accreditation findings should comply with the Accreditation Actions Guide consistently. In this respect, the Weakness findings in the accreditation review can not be justified. On the other hand changeover in the accreditation policy of the ABEEK may be necessary. If the quality of the engineering education is improved continuously through the accreditation review, accreditation fulfills its purpose.

목차

I. 서 론

II. 2015년 공학교육인증평가 판정결과 현황

Ⅲ. 인증기준 3의 미흡판정 사유 분석

Ⅲ. 결론 및 제언

키워드

Engineering Education Accreditation Review Evaluation Accreditation Criteria Weakness