정당한 보상으로서의 생활보상에 관한 비교법적 고찰

• 영문명: A review Comparative law on the living compensation as a just compensation
• 발행기관: 한국국가법학회
• 저자명: 고헌환(Ko, heon-hwan)
• 간행물 정보: 『국가법연구』국가법연구 제13집 1호, 1~23쪽, 전체 23쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.02.28

영문 초록

Taking must be accompanied by just compensation for the typical infringement of property by national authority. However, there is a continuing debate over the criteria and extent of compensation, content, content, etc. in relation to compensation. The loss of compensation is based on the possibility of continuing to live the life of the previous life, but it is often difficult to live a life or even threaten a living base. This causes many social and economic problems. Accordingly, it is inevitable to consider guaranteeing the guarantee of tenure as well as guaranteeing protection of tenure in order to protect the livelihood of the means of living. Living compensation should compensate for the damages incurred by the public and compensate for the damages incurred the public utility work, such as providing compensation for the provision of a special sacrifice to the public, such as providing incentives for job support, such as providing compensation for the provision of a job, living expenses, living rewards. This is a matter of living compensation and problem. In particular, the regulations on compensation for compensation in the country s land compensation law should be limited to a limited extent in comparison to other nations In this study, the Commission proposed a measure of compensation for compensation based on the principle of compensation and compensation for living compensation by the Korea and other nations.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 우리나라의 생활보상 법리

Ⅲ. 주요 외국의 생활보상 법리

Ⅳ. 우리나라와 주요 외국의 생활보상의 비교

Ⅴ. 맺음말

키워드

taking the loss compensation just compensation living compensation A special sacrifice the public utility work