본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

북한 非核化, 통일의 前提인가 그 産物인가?

이용수 56

영문명
발행기관
신아시아연구소(구 신아세아질서연구회)
저자명
박용옥(朴庸玉)
간행물 정보
『신아세아』新亞細亞 第22卷 第3號, 34~41쪽, 전체 8쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 정치외교학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2015.09.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

On Sept. 2, 2015, President Park Geun Hye had a summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The two leaders had a deep discussion about peaceful unification of the Korean Peninsula and expressed grave concern about North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs and provocative actions, such as nuclear and missile tests. In the aftermath of the summit, dialogues and consultations between South Korea, China, and North Korea seem likely to increase. At the summit, President Park urged China “to play a crucial role to bring about meaningful changes from the North.” She is determined to start preparations for unification. The question is how to manage the North Korean nuclear issue. As the Park-Xi summit talks indicate, the North’s nuclear issue is likely to remain within the Six-Party Talks framework, which has been reliant on China’s political attitudes toward North Korea, and has not been very effective. Will the Six-Party Talks, to resume sometime in the near future,produce any effective solution to the North Korean nuclear issue? Whether South Korea could initiate proactive roles in handling the North’s nuclear issue depends on its independent military capability to deter and retaliate against the North and whether its military capability will be recognized by neighboring countries, including North Korea. The Park Geun Hye government’s North Korea and unification policies are framed by such concepts as the trust-building process, Northeast Asian peace and cooperation, the Eurasian initiative, and others. These concepts cannot be implemented unless other parties in the region are willing to cooperate. Such cooperation should be a reflection of each party’s interests in and concerns with policies pursued by South Korea and their views about their national potential, not only economic but strategic and military, including the stability and steadiness of its alliance with the United States. Against this backdrop, the dismantlement of North Korean nuclear programs and the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula should be treated as a prerequisite for unification, rather than a subsequent outcome. The latter course seems likely to allow the North Korean nuclear issue to remain unresolved,with uncertainties as to when and under what conditions unification will occur.As President Park said “We Korean people can no longer tolerate to live with the North’s nuclear threat and blackmail on our heads.”

목차

Ⅰ. 북핵문제 실종되나?
Ⅱ. ‘힘’ 없이는 통일 주도도 어렵다
Ⅲ. 북핵위협 힘으로 억제할 수 있다
Ⅳ. 북핵제거는 통일의 선행과제다

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박용옥(朴庸玉). (2015).북한 非核化, 통일의 前提인가 그 産物인가?. 신아세아, 22 (3), 34-41

MLA

박용옥(朴庸玉). "북한 非核化, 통일의 前提인가 그 産物인가?." 신아세아, 22.3(2015): 34-41

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제