본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

국제경제법상 보편주의와 지역주의의 상보적 발전

이용수 105

영문명
The Development of Regionalism in tandem with Universalism in International Economic Law : Focusing on International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
발행기관
국제법평론회
저자명
임대성(Yim Dae Seong)
간행물 정보
『국제법평론』제40호, 203~217쪽, 전체 15쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2014.10.30
4,600

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Universalism became official through the concept of the international community, which was acknowledged through practices and principles. The Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties, a treaty law enforced in 1969, was the first international document to mention an international society. Article 53 defines jus cogens as "accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character." The same was stipulated in Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations, which was enforced in 1986. Also, the Draft Declaration on the Rights and Duties of States declares that "the states of the world form a community governed by international law." Regionalism has long been regarded as an important concept in international relations. The phenomenon, wherein close and concentrated economic, political, and social exchanges occur between countries in the same region or in adjacent neighborhoods based on geographic distribution, can be said to be regionalization, whereas towards that end, the artificial and political process of fine-tuning policies between countries and of forming beneficiary relations can be said to be regionalism, a concept opposed to universalism. That is, regionalism refers to the position by which to maintain regional spontaneity and yet promote solidarity and cooperation, based on regional specificity. Regionalism, under international law, generally does not necessarily form rules/principles or substantial portions of international human rights law or international economic law. The problem of regionalism is raised chiefly in connection to the problem of the universality of international law, and when reflecting regional specificity to amend and apply general rules, regionalism takes the pattern of norms. Such regionalism assumes a stronger meaning when, in the regional scope of effects, it implies principles or rules in the regional scope of validity, or means regional limitations in the scope of the validity of universal rules or principles. In the former case, rules and principles carry a positive meaning, making them binding only on the member countries in a specific region. In the latter case, regionalism carries a negative meaning, exempting countries in a specific region from universal rules or principles. Such concerns and doubts about the WTO system that various countries had led to the widening spread of the FTA system. As seen in the through DDA negotiations, the member countries were disappointed about the WTO system under which they had to sharply confront each other, and felt that the trade system that they wanted would be distant. They thus moved to pursue FTAs to effectively establish their own trade systems. While overcoming the time- and effort-consuming multilateral trade system required reaching a consensus, FTAs are now being widely used. Regionalism pursues cooperation in a region, an economic bloc, and some countries, and the FTA-centered regionalism in the field of trade, shedding regional constraints, moves to pursue cooperation between countries, with the aim of promoting commerce. In the field of trade, regionalism focuses on conducting trade between countries, and FTAs between countries are also included in the concept of regionalism. Specifically, regionalism in the field of trade, through regional trade agreements, refers to governments' measures to promote and liberalize trade, or to cooperation in lifting trade barriers by shedding regional constraints. It is very important to note that through discussions of universalism, international law is operated under a single global system. It should not be forgotten, though, that international law will be influenced by regional systems formed through treaty reservation an

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제법상 보편주의와 지역주의
Ⅲ. WTO체제하에서의 지역주의의 수렴: 상호보완적 관계의 형성
Ⅳ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

임대성(Yim Dae Seong). (2014).국제경제법상 보편주의와 지역주의의 상보적 발전. 국제법평론, (40), 203-217

MLA

임대성(Yim Dae Seong). "국제경제법상 보편주의와 지역주의의 상보적 발전." 국제법평론, .40(2014): 203-217

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제