성인지 예ㆍ결산서 대상사업 선정 및 합리적인 평가기준에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A research on budgetary program selection and evaluation criteria for gender budget statements and gender budget balance sheets
• 발행기관: 한국여성정책연구원(구 한국여성개발원)
• 저자명: 조선주(Sun Joo Cho) 김효주(Hyo Joo Kim) 김효선(Hyo Seon Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국여성정책연구원 연구보고서』2013 연구보고서(수시과제) 11, 1~138쪽, 전체 138쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 여성학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.11.30

국문 초록

1. 연구개요 □ 2006년부터 국가재정법에 따라 본격적으로 추진되기 시작한 성인지예산제도는 법ㆍ제도적인 기반 확충에 있어서 상당한 발전을 이루었음. 그러나 정책의 실효성에 대해서는 여전히 문제점이 제기되고 있음. 특히 도입초기부터 논란이 되었던 대상사업 선정기준 및 인센티브 등의 제도적 장치에 관해서는 여전히 합의를 찾지 못한 상태임 □ 기존의 연구들은 주로 제도시행의 도구와 절차에 비중을 두고 연구가 진행되었기 때문에 상기 해당 부분에 대해 국회 등에서 지적 사항이 있을 경우 단발적으로 대상사업 등에 대해 문제점을 지적하는 경우가 대부분이었으며, 면밀한 분석이 이루어지지는 못하였음. 본 연구는 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위해 합리적인 대상사업의 선정기준(안) 및 평가기준(안)을 개발하고 자 하였음. 또한 개발된 대상사업 선정기준(안)을 『2013년도 성인지예산서』에 적용하고, 평가기준을 『2013년도 성인지예산서』 및 『2011회계연도 성인지결산서』에 적용하여 그 결과를 제시하였음 □ 해당 평가의 목적은 작성된 성인지 예ㆍ결산서를 대상으로 기관의 추진노력 및 성과를 평가하고 사업별 우수사례와 미흡사례를 발굴함으로써 그 내용을 각 기관에 환류하는 데 있음 □ 본 연구는 합리적인 기준을 마련하고 이를 실제 적용해 본 시범연구(pilot study)이며, 동시에 시론적 연구로서 향후 해당 기준 및 모형의 타당성과 적용가능성은 지속적으로 보완ㆍ발전되어야 할 것임

영문 초록

Gender Budgeting System has achieved great development in expanding its legal and systematical basis since the system was in effect by the National Finance Act in 2006. However, there have been doubts expressed about the effectiveness of gender budgeting and there has yet been an agreement on the institutional strategy for providing a selection criteria for budgetary programs and its incentive system. In order to overcome such limitations, this research aims to develop both the budgetary program selection and evaluation criteria. Both criteria were applied to gender budget documents and the results are presented in the research. The budgetary program selection criteria were applied to the gender budget statement of fiscal year 2013, and the evaluation criteria were applied to the gender budget statement of fiscal year 2013 and the gender budget balance sheet of fiscal year 2011. The research results suggest the selection criteria and process in three steps. First, internal and external aspects of the budgetary programs should be classified by program sectors and tools, and for those aspects that can be analyzed and reviewed prior to the budgetary program selection should be categorized by following the government's two-hundred and seventy-six program selection criteria (Step 1). Second, by taking the Mid-Long Term Fiscal Policy and the Annual Budget Compilation Framework into account (Step 2), each government department selects their budgetary programs that they will focus on throughout the fiscal year by considering their gender equality objectives (Step 3). For new budgetary programs, a Gender Impact Assessment and an in-depth analysis by experts are recommended to be conducted in advance. The proposed criteria in the research were applied to budgetary programs in the 『2013 Gender Budget Statement』. Only eighty-three criteria among the two-hundred and seventy-six criteria were included in the current budgetary program selection, and the gender budget programs appeared to be concentrated in specific program sectors and tools (WelfareㆍEmploymentㆍHealth - Public Service, Education and Training, Human Resource Management). The evaluation criteria were proposed and the results of their application on central administrative agencies which prepared gender budget documents, and on gender budget programs were demonstrated in the research. According to the evaluation results of the agencies, the following agencies were rated as "Outstanding" or better for their gender budget statements - the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Employment and Labor, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, and the Ministry of Culture Sports and Tourism. For the gender budget balance sheets, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Employment and Labor, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Culture Sports and Tourism, the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Agency, Statistics Korea, and the National Police Agency were rated as "Outstanding" or better. According to the results of the evaluation on programs, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (40% of the gender budget statements and 70% of gender budget balance sheets were evaluated as "Outstanding") was determined to be an exemplary agency for preparing gender budget documents. However, prior to reviewing and developing the validity and applicability of the criteria, an agency for selecting gender budget programs should be institutionalized, and development in evaluation methodologies and the feedback system is necessary.

목차

발간사

연구요약

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 주요 평가제도의 현황과 시사점

Ⅲ. 성인지 예산서 대상사업 선정기준(안) 개발

Ⅳ. 성인지 예ㆍ결산서 평가기준(안) 개발 및 평가결과

Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책과제

참고문헌

부록

Abstract