본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

특허법상 '용이한 발명'의 판단방법에 관한 연구

이용수 15

영문명
Determination for 'Easy Invention' on Patent Law
발행기관
세창출판사
저자명
민경만(Min, Kyung-man)
간행물 정보
『창작과 권리』2010년 가을호 (제60호), 2~41쪽, 전체 39쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2010.09.01
7,480

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

According to the Korean Patent Law, determination of the inventive step is performed by considering the problem to be solved by the invention, the configuration of the invention, and the effect of the invention with an emphasis on the difficulty of its configuration and the distinctiveness of its effect. However, in the determination of whether or not an invention could have been easily invented, it is difficult to perfectly determine the achievement of the invention by taking into consideration only the configuration and effect of the invention, and a theory regarding secondary considerations is emerging. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to study in depth the determination criteria associated with an "easy invention", which has been recognized as the most ambiguous part in the determination of the inventive step. The patent system exists to contribute to industrial development, and the invention, i.e., the target for the protection of a patent, refers to a highly advanced product of a technical idea. In this regard, when it is difficult in terms of the configuration and effect of the invention as based on the creative content of the technical idea disclosed in the specification thereof to determine whether or not an invention has an inventive step, the following cases should be considered as those having a high degree of creativity and thus not falling under the category of inventions which are easy to devise: - the case where the technological development of an invention does not cause any immediate distinctive effect to be exhibited, but it contributes in a superb manner to the industrial development in the concerned technical field, and - the case where an invention appears to have a simple technical configuration, but an outcome of the development thereof is accomplished because of an inspirational idea never thought of before. By doing so, any issues resulting from the application of the secondary considerations(non-predictivity of creation), such as considering the commercial success or the prohibition of hindsight, could be solved. Accordingly, as criteria used to make a determination concerning whether an invention could have been easily invented or not when determining the inventive step, we believe it to be necessary to consider the extent of contribution which was made to industrial development and the creativity thereof, such as the degree to which these overcome any technical prejudice, in addition to considering the object of the invention and advanced features of the configuration and effect based on the disclosure of the invention described in the specification. Therefore, the determination elements for easy invention of the inventive step is suggested as the following 4 items. 1) specialty of object 2) difficulty of configuration 3) distinctiveness of effect 4) non-predictivity of creation

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 진보성 판단에서의 용이한 발명의 판단
Ⅲ. 외국의 입법례와 심사기준
Ⅳ. 용이한 발명의 판단시 문제점
Ⅴ. 해결방안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

민경만(Min, Kyung-man). (2010).특허법상 '용이한 발명'의 판단방법에 관한 연구. 창작과 권리, , 2-41

MLA

민경만(Min, Kyung-man). "특허법상 '용이한 발명'의 판단방법에 관한 연구." 창작과 권리, .(2010): 2-41

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제