학술논문
내부고발자 보호제도에 관한 연구
이용수 606
- 영문명
- The Study on the Protection of Whistleblower
- 발행기관
- 한국형사정책학회
- 저자명
- 권창국(Kwon, Chang-Kook)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사정책』刑事政策 第24卷 第3號, 187~216쪽, 전체 29쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.12.31
6,280원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In 2001, The Korean Whistleblower Protection Act that is called anti-corruption law was enacted, first time and then in 2011, by enaction of protection of accuser for public interest law, Whistleblower (inner accuser) Protection System was established completely in Korea.
so, during about 10 years, Although Whistleblower Protection System has been taken root in Korea, it is not enough to protect whistleblowers actually, seeing many cases of whistleblowing, for example, corruption of naval military supply case in 2009, slush fund of Samsung case in 2007, etc. the Whistleblower Protection System is understood the best method to prevention corruption and other crime or illegal activity in organization like as government, corporation and so on, by ordinary watching system that is offered by inner structure itself. but this system has negative side effect like as, weakening of solidarity in organization and members, shock about economic aspect by disclosure of trade secret, etc., falling of social trust or reputation about organization. so, some kinds of precondition are need in successful management of Whistleblower Protection System, so to speak, public condition.; first, there must be significant social harm in relation to whistleblowing case, second, priority of inner disclosure method, third, possibility o f proving t he case by s ound a nd o bjective evidence, forth, reasonable belief of whistleblower about case, fifth, the moral need to disclosure of case.
in this study, consulting to above justifying condition of whistleblowing and comparing with the Whistleblower Protection System of other country, problems in Korean Whistleblower Protection System and alternatives will be examined.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 내부고발자 보호제도와 정당화 조건
Ⅲ. 한국 및 영미, 일본 등의 내부고발자 보호제도의 비교검토
Ⅳ. 현행 내부고발자 보호제도의 검토
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!