새로운 再生産表式의 構想

• 영문명: A New Conception on the Reproduction Schema -Neither Marx nor Keynes-
• 발행기관: 서울대학교 경제연구소
• 저자명: Won-Taik Rim(林元澤)
• 간행물 정보: 『경제논집』경제논집 5권 1호, 41~88쪽, 전체 47쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1966.03.31

영문 초록

Preface 1. The theory of crisis is the last chapter of theoretical economics. Since there is no settled conviction even in basic problems of economics with its two hundred years of history, there are diversities in the theory of crisis, the super-theory of economics. 2. Modern business cycles theory of post-Keynesians is characterised by the fact that its common analytic tools are multiplier and acceleration principle based on the theory of income. But it is impossible to construct the theory of crisis, which must be based on the premise that total demand and total supply should be in disequilibrium, on the post-Keynesian immediate equilibrium theory which disregards the inevitable disequilibrium in total demand and total supply. 3. The theory of crisis m Marxian economics, also, falls into a chaotic condition because of its error in the law of value. But with all the confusion and cloudiness in its theoretical system, Marx's keen vision on "reality gives us far more valuable suggestion than modern business cycles theory, which is precise and technical, can give. I. The Theory of Crisis and the Theory of Reproduction are Split in Marxian Economics 1. It is understandable that Marxian economics, which aims to clarify the laws of economic movement in modern society, regards crisis as a unique phenomenon of capitalist economy and tries to seek the reason in the fundamental contradiction of capitalist economy, i.e., social production and private ownership. But Marx gives only fragmentary statements on crisis, and arranging his statements we conclude that he seeks the possibility of crisis in function of circulation of money (Type I) and function of payment of money (Type II) in money economy. These, however, are merely abstract. 2. And Marx seeks to find a more fundamental possibility of crisis in the split of direct production process and circulation process. But, he says, the possibility of crisis is different from the reason of crisis. The reason of crisis is the motive at which possibility turns into reality. 3. According to Marx, the fundamental reason of crisis is poverty and consumption repression of the mass compared to the impulse of capitalist production. But it is not clear how the fundamental reason, comparative shortage of consumption or comparative surplus of production, and the possibility of cirsis link. In this connection there is Interpretation I of Marx's theory of crisis as underconsumption theory. 4. Some Marxian economists intend to clarify the necessity of crisis by the expanded interpretation of the law of diminishing rate of profit. This is Interpretation II of Marx's theory of crisis. But the law of diminishing rate of profit itself is doubtful. 5. Marx, in his argument on reproduction and circulation of social total capital, presents the following reproduction schema: I. C₁+V₁+M₁=W₁ (Production sector of production means) II. C₂+V₂+M₂=W₂ (Production sector of consumption materials) From this schema he derives the conditions of simple and expanded reproductions. And he dare to regard their negative form as the possibility of crisis. From this Interpretation III of Marx's theory of crisis, the theory of inter-sectoral disproportionality of crisis, is derived by T. Baranovski. 7. Marx shows an actual possibility of proportional development by means of an illustration of a case where expanded reproduction proceeds smoothly under the three hypotheses about capital accumulation rate, rate of surplus value, and equilibrium both in production sector of production means and in production sector of consumption materials. Rosa Luxemburg, on the other hand, illustrates a case of disproportionate development under the hypotheses of increasing rate of capital accumulation, increasing rate of surplus value and higher organic composition of capital, and she introduces the necessity of unproductive consumption or the third person, to evade the disequilibrium. But she does not develop her th

목차

序言

Ⅰ. 「마르크스」經濟學에 있어서는 恐慌論과 再生産論이 分裂되어 있다

Ⅱ. 恐慌論과 再生産論은 이렇게 統一되어야 한다

Ⅲ. Market Widening과 Market Deepening