後進國勞使關係의 形成과 그 分析 (其 2)

• 영문명: An Analytical Framework of Industrial Relations in Underdeveloped Countries (Part II) -A Case Study of Korea-
• 발행기관: 서울대학교 경제연구소
• 저자명: Sik-Hyun Kim(金植鉉)
• 간행물 정보: 『경제논집』경제논집 4권 4호, 77~103쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1965.12.31

영문 초록

I The analysis of industrial relations problem in underdeveloped countries needs the frame of analysis that can explain the real aspects of the empirical industrial relations problems. For this purpose we have overviewed the developing aspect of industrial relations system in underdeveloped countries in Part I (Vol. III, No.1 of this Journal). At present, we can utilize the factors, which have been given definite meaning on the formulation of industrial relations system in underdeveloped countries, for the analysis of a given system of industrial relations of a country. For industrial relations study, we have to deal with the broad range of effecting circumstances, because we are often confronted with the unexpected facts that have never been explained fully before. Such a case can be seen more often in underdeveloped countries than advanced Western nations. If we want to know about the background of the superficial fact, we have to relate the fact with the relevant circumstances of the nation. The circumstances that are relevant to a distinctive aspect of industrial relations of a nation dwell not only in economic foundation but also in social and political power. II For the analysis of the characteristics of industrial relations system, we can choose the subject in every part of industrial relations phenomena. The subject may be the governmental rules or labor customs. The issues arising as industrial relations problem are so various that we cannot confine our attention to some specific field. But the most important part of our attention may be directed to the rules that regulate the industrial relations of a nation. The range of the rules is not limited in the area formally legislated by the government, management or labor, but the range of the rules with which we deal extends to informal or natural formulation of custom or behavior pattern. We include all the fields of industrial relations such as labor relations, social security, and personnel management, as the subject of our analysis. Without broad frame of analysis, we cannot give a full meaning to the cause of an industrial relations fact. Adopting interdisciplinary approach to the industrial relations problem we can connect the economic, social and political effects with the decision making context of industrial relations factors, i.e., management, labor and its organization and government agency. As the result we established a tentative system of analysis that relates the industrial relations phenomena not only with economic field but also with the non-economic social origin. With the frame of the system, we can find out more original causes of the present characteristics of Korean industrial relations. For the present, the shortness of available data in this field prevents us from the systematic analysis of Korean industrial relations. As the result, we cannot help retaining ourselves by overviewing the most distinctive characters of Korean industrial relations system and her economic and non-economic circumstances which have distinctive and relevant meaning in effecting some characteristics of Korean industrial relations system. In the first place we classified the basic circumstances of industrial relations of Korea as follows, and defined the most distinctive original aspects that have the relevant meanings in formulating distinctive character of Korean industrial relations system. Economic groundwork (i) Capital market situation, (ii) Material market situation, (iii) Man-power and Technical market situation. (iv) Commodity market situation. These include the capital condition, labor supply and demand condition and commodity market condition as well as non-economic cultural characteristics that give significant influences on the nature of industrial relations of Korea. Then we relate those basic conditions with concrete phenomena of labor union, collective bargaining in the field of industrial relations. (1) Labor organization: Just aft

목차

Ⅰ. 分析의 焦點

Ⅱ. 分析體系

Ⅲ. 分析要因

Ⅳ. 結言