한국 형법의 사회상규조항의 계보와 그 입법적 의의

• 영문명: The Pedigree of the 'normal social rules clause' of the Korean Criminal Code, and its Legislative Significance
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 김성돈(Kim, Seong-Don)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제24권 제4호, 3~45쪽, 전체 43쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.12.31

영문 초록

This treatise traces the pedigree of normal social rules clause of the Korean criminal Code and evaluates it's legislative significance. The following conclusion has been drawn: The normal social rules clause is not a product of Korean legislator’s independent decision. Instead, it was rather a concept of normal social rules concept employed by Makino who was the representative of the Japanese subjectivism criminal law theory, and his substantial illegality theory based on the normal social rules that Byungro Kim made use of. Makino’s substantial illegality theory was a radical premise which has its basis on the subjectivism theory of criminal law that attempts to retreat the liberty-assuring function of the principle of legality. This theory made the social evolutionary theory widespread in the 19th and early 20th century as its ideological foundation, and the Nazi criminal law also came out of the same chain of such theory. Since the legislative plan of the korean normal social rules clause has been taken a radical natural law-like or radical legal positivism-like methodology, it would be desirable to ultimately abolish this clause. However, even while the normal social rules clause is not being abolished and continues to exist, the details of the normal social rules concept should not be filled by morality nor ethic.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말

Ⅱ. 김병로의 사회상규론과 백여년 전의 실질적 위법성이론의 의의

Ⅲ. 사회상규를 준거로 삼는 실질적 위법성이론의 계보

Ⅳ. 실질적 위법성이론과 사회상규조항의 적용실무: 이론과 실제

Ⅴ. 사회상규조항의 입법적 의의에 대한 평가

Ⅵ. 나오는 말

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

사회상규 위법성 위법성조각사유 사회윤리 실질적 위법성 normal social rules illegality justification social ethics Die materielle Rechtswidrigkeit