학술논문
사실혼관계의 해소를 조건으로 한 인공수정의 법률관계
이용수 139
- 영문명
- A Study of Human Assisted Reproduction under the promise of terminating de facto Marriage ― Seoul Family Court Decision 2009Dehap13538 Delivered on June 22, 2011 ―
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 송재일(Song Jae ll)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』家族法硏究 第26卷 1號, 25~70쪽, 전체 46쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.03.31
8,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Seoul Family Court recently hold that human assisted reproduction under the promise of terminating de facto marriage is generally deemed as AIH. Thus, plaintiffs won some claims, for example child's relationship with its father, child support. This case might to be the leading case, providing some solutions as well as new questions regarding alternative reproduction during de facto marriage.
First, parentage relationship should be decided by the standard of child's welfare, though it is possible and legitimate to make artificial insemination during de facto marriage or under the promise to terminate de facto marriage. Second, termination period of de facto marriage must be decided differently case by case. For example, Termination of de facto marriage by mutual agreement is similar to the time to divorce by mutual agreement, while those period is considerable lengthened so long to protect the victim in case of the unilaterally breach de facto marriage. Third, immunity promise about the recognition and support of child
absolutely should be unenforceable as against child's best benefit. Fourth, there are two tests of differentiation between AID and AIH. Those are specificity and the existence of consent of sperm donor in the process of artificial reproduction. De facto marriage could be transformed to legal marriage so that child born under artificial insemination could take legitimation. Fifth, some agreement relevant family law might to be void against public policy.
Legislator of civil law could not think about legal problems regarding the artificial insemination which is introduced by development of technology and science so that there is few applicable law. Nevertheless, we can't avoid to judge the new legal issues because of gaps in law. We need to try to approach optimal conclusion by way of the resonable interpretation and the balance between best benefit of child and the private autonomy of the parties.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 사실관계 및 법원의 판단
Ⅲ. 사실혼관계의 성립과 해소
Ⅳ. 사실혼관계와 인공수정
Ⅴ. 인지·양육비 청구권 포기 각서의 효력
Ⅵ. 글을 맺으며(대상판례의 의의)
《참고문헌 》
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!