본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

‘흉기휴대 공갈’ 친족상도례 적용의 타당성

이용수 132

영문명
Validity of Applying Special Exception to Relatives with respect to ‘Extortion Armed with a Deadly Weapon’
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
김태수(Kim, Tae-Soo)
간행물 정보
『형사정책』刑事政策 第24卷 第1號, 145~162쪽, 전체 18쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.04.30
4,960

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Special exception to relatives applies to property crimes except robbery and destruction. Extortion armed with a deadly weapon unlike robbery shall have reasonable evidence why it shall apply to special exception to relatives. When the evidence is compared with robbery, first of all, it is not reasonable that the legal interest of extortion is on the side of possibility, generating from the resultof infringing life or body by violence or intimidation as the legal interest of robbery is to protect the life or body. Second, violence and intimidation of robbery are enough to have reached ‘suppression against the opposite party’s disobedience’. However, a robber tries to do violence or intimidation, but it is not rationale that the attempted robbery which is not enough to have reached suppression against the opposite party’s disobedience and the conspiracy or preparation for the robberywhich has not reached commencement stage is excluded as special exception to relatives. Third, robbery implies that one shall acquire any property or benefits to property against opposite party’s will, but it is not valid that embezzlement, breach of trust, and robbery apply to special exception to relatives, even though they acquire any property or benefits to property against opposite party’s will. Law on Punishment of Violent Acts excludes application of Banuisabulbeoljoe It means that the perpetrator shall not be punished if the victim does not want his punishment. in case of violence or intimidation with respect to ‘Armed with a deadly weapon to Relatives’. However, extortion armed with a deadly weapon to relatives applies to special exception. In other words, violence or intimidation to relatives is punished, but it is against people’s law sentiment that acquisition of any property or benefits to property by violence or intimidation is not punished. The reason of existence of special exception to relatives is to aim not for family members’ ownership or protection of property but for protection of family’s peace. Admitting it in case of possibility which gives relatives damages against their life or body would break a balance of social law and order totally and give up using the authority of the state’s punishment. If so, the criterion with respect to whether or not special exception to relatives applies shall exclude crimes which make it possible to injure relatives’life or body. Therefore, extortion and attempted extortion except robbery shall be excluded from application of special exception to relatives and it is reasonable that they are regulated by Law on Punishment of Violent Acts.

목차

Ⅰ. 사건개요 및 소송경과
Ⅱ. 연구
Ⅲ. 해결방안
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김태수(Kim, Tae-Soo). (2012).‘흉기휴대 공갈’ 친족상도례 적용의 타당성. 형사정책, 24 (1), 145-162

MLA

김태수(Kim, Tae-Soo). "‘흉기휴대 공갈’ 친족상도례 적용의 타당성." 형사정책, 24.1(2012): 145-162

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제