‘집단표시에 의한’ 모욕죄의 성립논리에 대한 검토

• 영문명: A Study on the Logic to Constitute Insult by Group Description
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 김봉수(Kim, Bong-Su)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제23권 제4호, 113~134쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.03.02

영문 초록

Our Criminal Law prescribes “Insult” in Article 311 that “A person who publicly insults another shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than one year or by a fine not exceeding two million won”. So, at issue lately, the “Group-Insult” is an inaccurate term. To understand it correctly, the so-called “Group-Insult” term need to draw a distinction between two different senses, such as (1) an insult “on a group itself”, (2) an insult “by expressing and displaying a group’s name”. the former is not allowed under current criminal law, because a group can not be a main agent of the honor as interests protected by law, while the latter means the insult not “for a group itself” but “for a component part(member) of a group”. the last case of insult to woman announcers and to National Assembly members have relevance to the latter sense. In reference to the case of insult to woman announcers, the trial court and appeals trial court plead guilty to constitute insult crime(Article 311) by group description, on the authority of the “principle of dilution” and “possibility of reminiscent”. This two principles cast a long shadow to vast an insult on a group in its component members. In the Criminal Law, this logic process is closely connected with problem of the victim’s specification.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설

Ⅱ. 판례를 통해서 본 ‘모욕죄’의 해석상 쟁점과 논의상황

Ⅲ. 소위 ‘집단모욕죄’에 대한 이해방식과 쟁점의 변화

Ⅳ. ‘집단표시에 의한’ 모욕죄의 성립논리에 대한 이론적 검토

Ⅴ. 결론

[Abstract]

키워드

집단표시 집단모욕(죄) 모욕(죄) 명예훼손(죄) 희석원리 연상가능성 피해자의 특정 group description group-contempt insult (contempt) defamation (libel) principle of dilution reminiscent possibility specification of victim