본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

형법 제23조 자구행위 등 위법성조각사유의 존재이유

이용수 265

영문명
A Study on the Purposes of Justifications including Self-help, etc
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
송진경(Song, Jin-Kyung)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제22권 제2호, 3~32쪽, 전체 30쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2010.02.04
6,400

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The criminal law basically protects the legal interests including individual's life, body freedom and property, etc. We usually think that individual's life, body and freedom are more important than property. So the question of the criminal law supporting self-help is a trouble-solving broker's criminal law because self-help as the ex-post emergency action violates other people's life, body in order to protect one's property. In these days, a few countries have self-help as one of the justification in criminal law. However, the legislators stipulated the self-help of clause 23 in 1953 when they established the Korean Criminal Law. They intended to rule definitely on the legal principles that be received by the scholars' theories at that time. Self-help is an ex-post emergency action after the violation is completed while Self-defense is an ex-ante emergency action. The action of self-help is admitted if it is impossible to preserve a claim by legal procedure. The ex-ante emergency action including self-defense, necessity is admitted to protects every legal interest. Self-help as the ex-post emergency action is restrictively admitted to protect the recoverable right. It does not mean that admitting self-help is ignoring other's body, freedom. All of the self-dense, necessity and self-help are the admissions that a man escape the crisis by one's own power if the country is not able to help the person in an emergency. As a result, self-defense, necessity and self-help are the individual's emergency actions if the country could not help individual. These emergency actions do not mean disregard of legal process or the principle of constitutional state but individual's measure to escape crisis.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 긴급행위와 법치국가 원칙
Ⅲ. 정당방위와 자구행위의 규율영역에 대한 재조명
Ⅳ. 제주지방법원 1997. 4. 2. 선고 96노384 판결과 자구행위
Ⅴ. 결 론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

송진경(Song, Jin-Kyung). (2010).형법 제23조 자구행위 등 위법성조각사유의 존재이유. 형사법연구, 22 (2), 3-32

MLA

송진경(Song, Jin-Kyung). "형법 제23조 자구행위 등 위법성조각사유의 존재이유." 형사법연구, 22.2(2010): 3-32

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제