학술논문
피해자의 시각에서 본 재정신청제도
이용수 180
- 영문명
- The Prosecution Compelling System from The Victim of Crime’s View
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第20卷 第2號 (2009), 51~74쪽, 전체 24쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.12.30
5,680원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Criminal Procedure Act regulates certain process to protect the victim of crime, but the system is insufficient. Especially the regulations in the Criminal Procedure Act need to be reinforced to actively protect the victim of crime. The victim should be provided a public defender if needed and be accepted to participate in the criminal trial. At the trial the application for challenge should be allowed.
The revised Criminal Procedure Act has improved at protecting the victim of crime, but still needs additional progress in several areas. There is some opinion that the prosecution compelling system exists to regulate Prosecutorial discretion, instead of protecting the right for the victim of crime. However since the claim for prosecution compelling is taken back when the victim of crime withdraws the complaints, it should be the other way around. In this way the effect that regulates Prosecutorial discretion is additional. The biggest flaw about the current prosecution compelling system is that after the prosecution compelling is accepted, the Prosecutor has to maintain the public prosecution. When the court overrules the disposition for non-prosecution after going through prosecution compelling and prosecution appeal, there’s no reason to compel the Prosecutor to sustain the public prosecution.
By going through the procedure, the lack of trust to the Prosecutor will lead the victim of crime against the idea. Moreover the Prosecutor will have self contradiction maintaining the public prosecution when he/she thinks the accused is not guilty. Instead of this, the attorney of the victim of crime should maintain the public prosecution. A public defender should be available if needed, since the victim of crime has rights to be advised by an attorney. In this way, the protection of the victim of crime and regulating Prosecutorial discretion can both be done, and the court will no longer have to do both the prosecution and trial at the same time.
목차
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 지방자치단체의 자체감사제도 개선 및 독립성 확보방안
- 피치의 국내은행 스트레스 테스트에 대한 고찰
- 국민참여재판의 문제점과 개선방안
- 경찰 검시관 운영에 대한 고찰
- 일·한·중에 있어서 부실등기를 신뢰한 선의의 거래자의 보호에 관한 비교 고찰
- 법학연구소 활동 외
- Legal Systems of the Countries of Northeast Asia
- 피해자의 시각에서 본 재정신청제도
- 사실혼 보호 법리의 재검토
- 刊行辭
- Scope of Application of the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts
- DNA 데이터베이스 구축을 위한 헌법적 검토
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!