본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

피해자의 시각에서 본 재정신청제도

이용수 180

영문명
The Prosecution Compelling System from The Victim of Crime’s View
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung)
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第20卷 第2號 (2009), 51~74쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2009.12.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The Criminal Procedure Act regulates certain process to protect the victim of crime, but the system is insufficient. Especially the regulations in the Criminal Procedure Act need to be reinforced to actively protect the victim of crime. The victim should be provided a public defender if needed and be accepted to participate in the criminal trial. At the trial the application for challenge should be allowed. The revised Criminal Procedure Act has improved at protecting the victim of crime, but still needs additional progress in several areas. There is some opinion that the prosecution compelling system exists to regulate Prosecutorial discretion, instead of protecting the right for the victim of crime. However since the claim for prosecution compelling is taken back when the victim of crime withdraws the complaints, it should be the other way around. In this way the effect that regulates Prosecutorial discretion is additional. The biggest flaw about the current prosecution compelling system is that after the prosecution compelling is accepted, the Prosecutor has to maintain the public prosecution. When the court overrules the disposition for non-prosecution after going through prosecution compelling and prosecution appeal, there’s no reason to compel the Prosecutor to sustain the public prosecution. By going through the procedure, the lack of trust to the Prosecutor will lead the victim of crime against the idea. Moreover the Prosecutor will have self contradiction maintaining the public prosecution when he/she thinks the accused is not guilty. Instead of this, the attorney of the victim of crime should maintain the public prosecution. A public defender should be available if needed, since the victim of crime has rights to be advised by an attorney. In this way, the protection of the victim of crime and regulating Prosecutorial discretion can both be done, and the court will no longer have to do both the prosecution and trial at the same time.

목차

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung). (2009).피해자의 시각에서 본 재정신청제도. 법학연구, 20 (2), 51-74

MLA

김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung). "피해자의 시각에서 본 재정신청제도." 법학연구, 20.2(2009): 51-74

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제