학술논문
집행유예에 관한 판례 동향과 개선방안
이용수 148
- 영문명
- Precedent Tendency and Improvement Scheme on the Probation
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김재중(Kim Jae-Jung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第19卷 第1號 (2008), 295~317쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.06.01
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The probation is the system that, in case of that the court gives decision of a conviction on indicted case, it gives suspension of a sentence during given time under given conditions and with the passage of given time, the effect of decision becomes invalid.
We can expect this system to prevent a offender from committing a crime again because it removes the abuse of short-term imprisonment and frightens a offender into executing a sentence in case of committing a crime again.
However, in practice, because people as well as the parties on a suit think that there exists a huge gap between the prison sentence and probation, the probation is controversial in that it only focuses on avoidance of imprisonment and brings discredit on court as a result.
Hence, the writer examines the latest trend of precedents and states the remedies of the current probation. That is, 1) the court necessarily sentences a offender to probation in case of sentencing him to short-term imprisonment under six months, 2) in case of sentencing a offender to probation on condition that he recovers damages for a victim, if a offender don"t recover damages for a victim, the court annuls a decision of probation, 3) the court sentences a offender who is on probation to probation again through the revision of criminal law and 4) in case of sentencing a offender to amercement, the court can sentence him to probation.
We can expect this system to prevent a offender from committing a crime again because it removes the abuse of short-term imprisonment and frightens a offender into executing a sentence in case of committing a crime again.
However, in practice, because people as well as the parties on a suit think that there exists a huge gap between the prison sentence and probation, the probation is controversial in that it only focuses on avoidance of imprisonment and brings discredit on court as a result.
Hence, the writer examines the latest trend of precedents and states the remedies of the current probation. That is, 1) the court necessarily sentences a offender to probation in case of sentencing him to short-term imprisonment under six months, 2) in case of sentencing a offender to probation on condition that he recovers damages for a victim, if a offender don"t recover damages for a victim, the court annuls a decision of probation, 3) the court sentences a offender who is on probation to probation again through the revision of criminal law and 4) in case of sentencing a offender to amercement, the court can sentence him to probation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 집행유예에 대한 일반론
Ⅲ. 대법원 판례 동향
Ⅳ. 결론 - 집행유예제도 개선 방안-
참고문헌
【Abstract】
Ⅱ. 집행유예에 대한 일반론
Ⅲ. 대법원 판례 동향
Ⅳ. 결론 - 집행유예제도 개선 방안-
참고문헌
【Abstract】
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 중국 물권법의 기본내용과 문제점, 향후과제
- 遺傳子技術의 規制原理
- 영국의 부동산등기절차
- 주역의 법자연의 원리와 규범관
- 리스트(Franz von Liszt)의 刑法學 方法論
- 집행유예에 관한 판례 동향과 개선방안
- 자동차사고로 인한 피해보상에 관한 소고 - 자동차손해배상보장법을 중심으로
- 중국 불법행위 입법 소개
- 家庭暴力과 離婚後 子女養育에 관한 一考
- 刊行辭
- 국민의 형사재판 참여
- 의무보호예수제도 - 법적 쟁점을 중심으로
- 친자관계소송에서의 DNA감정
- Some Topical Problems of the Development of Russian Private Law
- 일본 지방분권의 추진현황과 과제
- Problems of Forming Property Rights to Natural Resources
- 「법학연구」 투고지침 외
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!