본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

聲聞戒와 菩薩戒의 兩立 問題

이용수 149

영문명
On the Coexistence of Srāvaka-sila and Bodhisattva-sila
발행기관
불교학연구회
저자명
이수창(Lee Soo-chang)
간행물 정보
『불교학연구』제20호, 35~61쪽, 전체 27쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 불교학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2008.08.01
6,040

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  After the Mah?y?na Buddhism rose greatly in India, the Mah?y?nikas accepted and observed two precepts simultaneously, ?r?vaka-??la handed down from the Nik?ya-sa?gha and Bodhisattva-??la from the Bodhisattvaga?a. Then, why did the Mah?y?na Buddhism in India attempt to keep ?r?vaka-??la and Bodhisattva-??la together? How did China try to overcome this problem? And does Bodhisattva-??la still hold good these days? This paper aims at examining these questions.
  The early Mah?y?na Buddhism in India did not accept ?r?vaka-??la transmitted from the Nik?ya-sa?gha. The Mah?y?na Buddhism started by denying both dhamma and vinaya of the traditional Buddhism from the very beginning. But the middle Mah?y?na Buddhism got the system almost the same as that of the Nik?ya-sa?gha. Consequently, the need to organize the system of the Mah?y?na by absorbing p?timokkha of the Nik?ya-sa?gha was arisen. The fruit obtained from these circumstances was none other than trividh?ni-??lani. It is an understanding of various s?tras that absorbed ?r?vaka-??la together with Bodhisattva-??la in a superior position.
  Chinese Buddhism that inherited the tradition of the Mah?y?na Buddhism accepted both H?nay?navinaya(?r?vaka-??la) and Mah?y?na-??la(Bodhisattva-??la) from the beginning. Because of this acceptance, both an indifferent attitude to Buddhist precepts and a tendency to neglect s?las and vinayas were widespread in China. In order to correct this drift, Doseon(道宣, 596~667) completed Namsanyuljong(南山律宗). He conducted a revival campaign of Buddhist precepts by setting up a way of understanding various Buddhist s?las called "Buntongdaeseung(分通大乘)" that means Caturvarga Vinaya(四分律) is closely related to the Mah?y?na Buddhism. However, Namsanyuljong declined after Doseon passed away as the fusion of H?nay?na-vinaya and Mah?y?na-??la was not possible from the beginning.
  In conclusion, the ideals Bodhisattva-??la tries to pursue are very high. But, as Bodhisattva-??la lacks compulsory vinaya and karmav?c?, it is hard to expect its effectiveness these days. On account of these reasons, even in the present Mahayana Buddhist Sa?gha, Bodhisattva-??la is often ignored. In a word, it is impossible for ?r?vaka-??la and Bodhisattva-??la to exist together.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 聲聞戒와 菩薩戒의 槪念과 意味
Ⅲ. 菩薩戒의 成立과 展開過程
Ⅳ. 菩薩戒의 限界와 問題點
Ⅴ. 맺음말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이수창(Lee Soo-chang). (2008).聲聞戒와 菩薩戒의 兩立 問題. 불교학연구, (20), 35-61

MLA

이수창(Lee Soo-chang). "聲聞戒와 菩薩戒의 兩立 問題." 불교학연구, .20(2008): 35-61

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제