‘수인의 채무자 있는 채권관계’의 이해에 대한 비판적 검토

• 영문명: A Critical Analysis of the Traditional Theory on the Legal Relation of Plurality of Debtors
• 발행기관: 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
• 저자명: 제철웅(Cheol-Ung Je)
• 간행물 정보: 『비교사법』比較私法 제15권 제1호, 1~51쪽, 전체 51쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.03.30

영문 초록

  Korean civil code knows two types of co-debtor: solidarity obligation similiar to joint and several liability in english civil law and indivisible obligation, in addition to which improper solidarity obligation is also acknowledged as a kind of co-debtor by the civil law jurisprudence. This article criticizes the majority of the tradional civil law jurisprudence on the solidarity obligation, which has considered the discharging effect a material alteration(a novatio), release, confusion and so on have in relation to another joint debtors as weakening the suretyship purpose and which has made a sharp critic against these-related rules of korean civil code as a legislation not reflecting the suretyship function of joint debtors. But this article estimates many relevant korean civil code rules as respecting legitimate interests of joint debtors, on the contrary to the traditional theory insisting some rules related to fostering suretyship function overestimate the interest of creditor against general civil law principles. Through the analysis of the traditional theory on the figure “co-debtor”, this article aims to reconstruct the legal relation of plurality of debtors.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 외국법과의 비교
Ⅲ. 우리 민법의 공동채무의 유형과 그 특징
Ⅳ. 민법에서 규율하지 않는 공동채무의 유형과 그 내용은 어떻게 형성할 것인가?
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]

키워드

연대채무 불가분채무 부진정연대채무 채권ㆍ채무의 공동소유적 귀속 공동채무 수인의 채무자 있는 채권관계 Solidarity Obligation Joint Liability Joint and Several Liability Indivisible Obligation Plurality of Debtors