학술논문
삼손의 수수께끼(사사기 14:14,18) 연구
이용수 140
- 영문명
- Studies on Samson's Riddle[הדיח] in Judges 14.14 and 18.
- 발행기관
- 한국중동학회
- 저자명
- 최창모(CHOI Chang-mo)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국중동학회논총』제25권 제2호, 221~238쪽, 전체 18쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 지역학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.02.01
4,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Although the history of the reception of Samson"s riddle(Judg 14.14,18) within the Jewish and Christian traditions underlines its brilliancy, a convincing interpretation has not yet been given. Unnecessary intricacies that adhere to certain attempts to solve the riddle have often resulted from a procedure that deviates too quickly from the level of textual expression.
The story of the riddle is no less an integral part of the legend of Samson than that of the torch-tailed foxes. Like the latter, it poses a number of questions because of its inconsistency with the biblical world, but unlike the story of the foxes many of these questions have aleady been noted and discussed, and may be put as follows:
(1)Is the "riddle" a common literary form in the Bible, or is this instance unique?
(2)Is this reddle a riddle within the meaning of the definition of this literary form?
(3)What language, i.e. common means and terms of communication of ideas, did Samson and his interlocutors speak?
Samson"s narrative not only integrates disparate elements, but it also involves an unusually complex structure. The riddle of Samson in Judg.14.14 and its answer in v.18 raise a number of difficulties and have produced a variety of explanations, none of which is wholly satisfactory. With regard to the riddle itself, it has been held that it would be an impossible task, since to answer it would require a knowledge of a particular event which Samson"s companions would not conceivably possess.
I will argue that the aim of the riddle is to narrate a particular "story" and not to tell riddles. Therefore it must harmonize the riddle with the sequence of the narrative history. The structure of the "history" and that of the riddle then became so intertwined that it looks as though the historical events occasioned the development of the riddle.
The narrator of the Samson story ironically utilized the truth of Samson"s riddle in his motif-centered history of Samson. This motif is employed by the narrator as a means of structural progression in the story. Therefore the riddle of Samson has a functional position at the beginning of the real plot, i.e. the conflict between the Philistines and Yahweh.
What I have tried to suggest here, in fact, is that there may be as much to learn about border formation from the fictionality of the Samson story, its use of ouns and riddles, the patterns that give shape to its plot, its possible mimicry of the other side"s story-telling traditions, as there is from investigating whether or not it reflects historical reality, noting as we have that borders are themselves a kind of fiction crafted through the way people imagine space.
The story of the riddle is no less an integral part of the legend of Samson than that of the torch-tailed foxes. Like the latter, it poses a number of questions because of its inconsistency with the biblical world, but unlike the story of the foxes many of these questions have aleady been noted and discussed, and may be put as follows:
(1)Is the "riddle" a common literary form in the Bible, or is this instance unique?
(2)Is this reddle a riddle within the meaning of the definition of this literary form?
(3)What language, i.e. common means and terms of communication of ideas, did Samson and his interlocutors speak?
Samson"s narrative not only integrates disparate elements, but it also involves an unusually complex structure. The riddle of Samson in Judg.14.14 and its answer in v.18 raise a number of difficulties and have produced a variety of explanations, none of which is wholly satisfactory. With regard to the riddle itself, it has been held that it would be an impossible task, since to answer it would require a knowledge of a particular event which Samson"s companions would not conceivably possess.
I will argue that the aim of the riddle is to narrate a particular "story" and not to tell riddles. Therefore it must harmonize the riddle with the sequence of the narrative history. The structure of the "history" and that of the riddle then became so intertwined that it looks as though the historical events occasioned the development of the riddle.
The narrator of the Samson story ironically utilized the truth of Samson"s riddle in his motif-centered history of Samson. This motif is employed by the narrator as a means of structural progression in the story. Therefore the riddle of Samson has a functional position at the beginning of the real plot, i.e. the conflict between the Philistines and Yahweh.
What I have tried to suggest here, in fact, is that there may be as much to learn about border formation from the fictionality of the Samson story, its use of ouns and riddles, the patterns that give shape to its plot, its possible mimicry of the other side"s story-telling traditions, as there is from investigating whether or not it reflects historical reality, noting as we have that borders are themselves a kind of fiction crafted through the way people imagine space.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 수수께끼란 무엇인가?
Ⅲ. 삼손의 수수께끼
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
영어 초록
Ⅱ. 수수께끼란 무엇인가?
Ⅲ. 삼손의 수수께끼
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
영어 초록
해당간행물 수록 논문
- "Urfi marriage, an Egyptian Version of Cohabitation?
- 모로코아랍어의 음절 연구
- Water Resources in the Middle East: Conflict and Management
- 아랍문학과 영화교육 사례연구
- 이집트의 대영 독립투쟁(1914-1922) - 이집트 민족주의자의 움직임을 중심으로
- 후세인의 전쟁 선택요인에 대한 인식론적 고찰 - 1차 걸프전과 사담 후세인의 선택을 중심으로
- 예루살렘 소유권 논쟁
- 중동ㆍ이슬람 사회의 분쟁연구 - 레바논 분쟁을 중심으로
- 아랍어 불변사 첨가에 관한 연구
- 삼손의 수수께끼(사사기 14:14,18) 연구
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 지역학분야 NEW
- 존재론적 안보 관점에서 분석한 사우디아라비아의 소프트 파워 전략
- 이스라엘의 하레디 유대인들은 누구인가
- 메타인지 읽기 전략 지도가 아랍어 학습자의 읽기 전략 사용과 읽기 능력에 미치는 영향
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!