문화의 영향과 도덕적 책임의 문제 - Adams와 Calhoun의 도덕적 무지 개념에 대한 윤리문화적 검토

• 영문명: The Cultural Effect on Individual Moral Responsibility ― Centered on the Concept of Moral Ignorance of Adams and Calhoun ―
• 발행기관: 한국불교연구원
• 저자명: 허남결(Nam-Kyol Heo)
• 간행물 정보: 『불교연구』불교연구 제24집, 147~164쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 불교학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.02.01

영문 초록

  Human actions are generally said to be affected by the culture of their societies. If so, are all our moral acts able to be justified with our own cultural value standard? Here arises the question of cultural effect and moral responsibility. According to M. Moody Adams and C. Calhoun our actions are not free from our social, historical environments, that is, our cultural constraints. Especially they have interests in the moral meaning of ‘affected ignorance’ and examine in it concretely. Their conclusions are our moral affected ignorances should be allowed in an exceptional case only. Because this could give an indulgence to some morally wrong doings by anyone. I principally agree with their views on moral ignorance, but have different opinions about several questions. My individual position of moral affected ignorance is described in the following contents of my essay.   Ⅰ. Introduction; Are Affected Moral Act and its Responsibility by Culture?   Ⅱ. Adams; Affected Ignorance and Moral Responsibility of Ordinary Wrongs   (1)In the Case of Athene   (2)In the Case of Nazi   Ⅲ. Calhoun; Moral Ignorance and Responsibility in Normal Contexts and Abnormal Contexts   (1)In the Case of Normal Moral Contexts   (2)In the Case of Abnormal Moral Contexts   Ⅳ.Conclusion; Is Our Moral Responsibility Unlimited?

목차

Ⅰ. 서론; 도덕적 행위와 책임은 문화의 영향을 받는가?
Ⅱ. 아담스; 가장된 무지 및 일상적인 잘못들의 도덕적 책임
Ⅲ. 칼훈; 정상적인 맥락 및 비정상적인 맥락에서의 도덕적 무지와 책임
Ⅳ. 맺음말; 도덕적 책임은 무한하다?
Abstract

키워드

문화 도덕적 행위 정상적 맥락 비정상적 맥락 가장된 무지 도덕적 책임