학술논문
중국의 가부장제와 공·사 영역에 관한 고찰
이용수 329
- 영문명
- The Issues of the Public-Private Division in the Chinese Patriarchal System
- 발행기관
- 이화여자대학교 한국여성연구원
- 저자명
- 이상화(Lee Sang-Wha)
- 간행물 정보
- 『여성학논집』제14·15합집, 195~231쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 여성학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 1998.12.01
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The division of the public and private spheres has been a major focus for feminist debates in explaining women's exploitation. According to many Western feminists, it is this division, fully established in the Nineteenth Century in Western society, that justifies the norms of gender hierarchy. The question posed is whether the conceptual division of the public and private is applicable to other Asian societies, which have long cherished patriarchal traditions. By taking Chinese society as an example, this paper aims at analyzing how the pubic/private dichotomy is interpreted in traditional Confucian Chinese society. It also seeks to examine the attempts made at promoting women's participation in the public sphere in modern China.
The concepts of the private and public in Confucian traditions have, more likely, intertwined compared to the Ancient Greek and modern Western societies that been developed very discrete ideas of the private as opposed to the public. This is well demonstrated in the Chinese political system, which has been based on the ideal of "kaguktonggu(家國同構)", which literally means that the family and the state have the same structure. According to this definition, there was a clear division between the public and the private, but the rules governing the two spheres were identical. It is here that we should add another theoretical framework, in order to fully understand the ways in which Chinese patriarchy operated. The principle of "Nae(內)-Oe(外) [inside/outside]," which rigorously classifies activities, roles and living space according to sex, governed everyday lives in Chinese society. This "inside-outside" dichotomy appears to be analogous to the pubic-private opposition in western feminist thought.
In fact, the marriage system and the rules of inheritance, which are some of the central traits of the patriarchal system, have been based on the `inside-outside' dichotomy and have undergone little change for two thousand years since these were established during the Chu Dynasty. The exclusion of women from the public sphere in China was as consistently maintained as it was for women in Western societies. After the communist revolution, however, the Chinese state has made remarkable breakthroughs, owing to its modernizing project with respect to women's lives, and by eliminating barriers that hinder women's participation in the public sphere. This revolutionary shift, however, had its own limitations insofar as the new democratic patriarchal system that emerged was a mixture of socialist ideas and the traditional patriarchal system. In other words, the revolutionary reforms for gender equity, which aimed to eliminate the `inside-outside' sexual opposition, were not able to get rid of deep-rooted patriarchal traditions. However, it is also true that this was the first time in Chinese history that women became active participants in the public and political arenas, since the Cultural Revolution, and should be evaluated as a big step forward for the Chinese women's movement.
From a feminist perspective, any consideration of the question of Chinese women's liberation must also recognize that it was the political interests of the Chinese state, not merely the women's movement, that led to women's political participation on a mass scale. As repeatedly shown in the case of China, the state-led women's movement has a weak foundation. There is evidence that in the recent social discourse of "Punyohoega(婦女回家) [women must go back home]", emerging after the reform eras of the 1980s, the state has sought to bring women back into the domestic sphere, so as to adjust its restructuring of Chinese society according to the principles of a socialist market economy.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국 가부장제의 공·사 개념과 성별관계
Ⅲ. 중국 가부장제의 성립
Ⅳ. 중국의 근대화와 가부장제
Ⅴ. 개혁개방과 부녀회가(婦女回家) 논쟁
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 공통 언어와 개념틀 모색을 향하여
- <여성학과 석사학위 논문 개요> 1998년 8월 졸업
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 인도네시아 여성학의 발전과 현황 그리고 도전
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 태국의 여성학
- 독일통일 이후 동독여성의 생활변화에 관한 사례연구
- 현대 윤리학의 위기와 페미니즘
- 1890년대 신조합주의와 영국 여성노동조합운동
- <여성학과 석사학위 논문 개요> 1997년 8월 졸업
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 인도의 여성학
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 필리핀의 여성학 : 발전과 도전의 25년
- 일본사회에 있어서 공·사영역의 역사적 전개와 여성
- 한국 여성 소설문학과 모성
- 중국의 가부장제와 공·사 영역에 관한 고찰
- 인도 여성의 보살핌 : 공·사영역의 교차점
- 한국사 속에서 여성의 공적영역과 사적영역 - 전근대사회로부터 개화기까지 -
- 한국여성연구원 활동휘보 외
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 인도의 여성학센터
- 간행사
- 베트남 통일의 교훈 : 여성의 사회통합 과정을 중심으로
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 중국의 여성학
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 태국 여성학의 발달과정 : 불가시적 존재로부터 학문의 지위로
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 일본의 여성학
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 한국 대학에서의 여성학 교육 개관
- <여성학과 석사학위 논문 개요> 1998년 2월 졸업
- 생명여성주의와 모성
- <아시아 여성학 교과과정개발 국제학술세미나 Ⅰ> 일본 대학의 여성학
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!