본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

日本의 流動集合債權讓渡擔保

이용수 45

영문명
The Floating Lien of a Collective Receivable in Japan
발행기관
한국재산법학회
저자명
신봉근(Sin Bong-Geun)
간행물 정보
『재산법연구』재산법연구 제22권 제1호, 295~326쪽, 전체 32쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2005.06.01
6,640

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In Japan, the floating lien of a collective receivable has been used by men of affairs for a long time. It is mainly used in financial affairs, for example, factoring, lease, selling on credit, etc. It is connected with what is called a principle of security-offering that occupies a important base in Japanese civil transaction. It is classified with different types on the basis of affair forms. Its effectiveness is generally approved by many scholars and judges. But it is not always effective. That is to say, its effectiveness can be approved, only when a possibility the receivable happens exists to some degree. Some doctrines can be indicated on the basis of the degree of the possibility. A certain scholars say that the possibility is not needed with some legal grounds. And the receivable should be specified by a transferor to transfer effectively. Requisites of the specification are a kind of receivables, a period of receivables, a limit of receivables and obligors of transferor. And the rule, what is called 'public order and costume' can be offended, if a transferor and his another obligees are infringed their interest on account of a unfair settlement of security. In conclusion, its effectiveness, the specification and the rule are closely connected with one another. Moreover, A special requisite is needed to claim a legal transference to obligors of transferor and a third party. That is the very notice to obligors of transferor or consent from them, and many scholars are discussing this requisite should be loosen. By the way, as a matter of fact, many Japanese judicial precedents about this subject exist, because this security method has been used for fifty years in Japan. These judicial precedents must be good materials to study it, because they are concerned with its effectiveness, the specification, the rule and the requisite. Most of all, I hope that this thesis help you understand it.

목차

Ⅰ. 序 論
Ⅱ. 流動集合債權讓渡擔保의 法理
Ⅲ. 結 論
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

신봉근(Sin Bong-Geun). (2005).日本의 流動集合債權讓渡擔保. 재산법연구, 22 (1), 295-326

MLA

신봉근(Sin Bong-Geun). "日本의 流動集合債權讓渡擔保." 재산법연구, 22.1(2005): 295-326

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제