학술논문
日本의 流動集合債權讓渡擔保
이용수 45
- 영문명
- The Floating Lien of a Collective Receivable in Japan
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 신봉근(Sin Bong-Geun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』재산법연구 제22권 제1호, 295~326쪽, 전체 32쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.06.01
6,640원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In Japan, the floating lien of a collective receivable has been used by men of affairs for a long time. It is mainly used in financial affairs, for example, factoring, lease, selling on credit, etc. It is connected with what is called a principle of security-offering that occupies a important base in Japanese civil transaction. It is classified with different types on the basis of affair forms. Its effectiveness is generally approved by many scholars and judges. But it is not always effective. That is to say, its effectiveness can be approved, only when a possibility the receivable happens exists to some degree. Some doctrines can be indicated on the basis of the degree of the possibility. A certain scholars say that the possibility is not needed with some legal grounds. And the receivable should be specified by a transferor to transfer effectively. Requisites of the specification are a kind of receivables, a period of receivables, a limit of receivables and obligors of transferor. And the rule, what is called 'public order and costume' can be offended, if a transferor and his another obligees are infringed their interest on account of a unfair settlement of security. In conclusion, its effectiveness, the specification and the rule are closely connected with one another. Moreover, A special requisite is needed to claim a legal transference to obligors of transferor and a third party. That is the very notice to obligors of transferor or consent from them, and many scholars are discussing this requisite should be loosen.
By the way, as a matter of fact, many Japanese judicial precedents about this subject exist, because this security method has been used for fifty years in Japan. These judicial precedents must be good materials to study it, because they are concerned with its effectiveness, the specification, the rule and the requisite.
Most of all, I hope that this thesis help you understand it.
목차
Ⅰ. 序 論
Ⅱ. 流動集合債權讓渡擔保의 法理
Ⅲ. 結 論
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 民法 第755條의 監督者責任
- 2重賣買의 법률관계
- 日本의 流動集合債權讓渡擔保
- 민법 개정안 제242조의 2 (경계를 침범한 건축)에 관한 연구
- 직장내 성희롱과 민사책임
- 契約責任法의 새로운 展開 - 유럽 契約法原則을 中心으로 -
- 제조물책임법과 제조물책임 - 법경제학적 비교 고찰을 중심으로 -
- 신민사소송법에서의 문서제출의무의 범위
- 표현대표이사가 대표이사를 대행한 행위에 대한 회사의 책임
- 金融割賦契約의 法的 構造와 問題點
- 未加工 1次 農水畜産物의 결함으로 인한 제조물책임 - 독일 제조물책임법 제2조의 개정내용을 중심으로 -
- 개인회생절차개시 전의 재산보전
- 附錄
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!