그록스터 사건에 대한 미 연방대법원의 최종 판단과 온라인서비스제공자의 불법행위책임

• 영문명: U.S. Supreme Court’s Final Decision of Grokster Case and OSP’s Liability for Illegal Act
• 발행기관: 한국재산법학회
• 저자명: 최상필(Choi Sang-Pil)
• 간행물 정보: 『재산법연구』재산법연구 제22권 제2호, 317~354쪽, 전체 38쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.10.01

영문 초록

At the Final Decision of Case “Grokster/Streamcast”, the United States Supreme Court admitted the responsibility of OSPs, as with the Case “Napster”. This decision would provide the owners of the copyright with more powerful right, while it would invite a fatal blow to development and distribution of P2P technology of Online Service Providers. U.S. Supreme Court judged that distributor of a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright ist liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties using the device, regardless of the device’s lawful uses. The Court clarified the reasons as follows: ① Each of the respondents showed itself to be aiming to satisfy a known source of demand for copyright infringement, the market comprising former Napster users. ② Neither respondent attempted to develop filtering tools or other mechanisms to diminish the infringing activity using their software. ③ Respondents make money by selling advertising space, then by directing ads to the screens of computers employing their software. This paper critically analyzes and carefully examines this decision as to whether it is applicable in Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. P2P 방식에 의한 저작권 침해

Ⅲ. Grokster 사건에서의 OSP 책임

Ⅳ. 각국의 입법과 사례의 적용

Ⅴ. 저작권의 행사와 독점규제

Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract