Reliability and Validity of Balancia 2.5 Program Using Wii Balance Board for Assessment of Static Balance Ability

• 영문명: Reliability and Validity of Balancia 2.5 Program Using Wii Balance Board for Assessment of Static Balance Ability
• 발행기관: 물리치료재활과학회
• 저자명: Ho Kim Dong-Min Kum Won-Seob Shin
• 간행물 정보: 『Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science』제11권 제4호, 488~492쪽, 전체 5쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 재활의학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.12.31

영문 초록

Objective: The purpose of this study is to find out the reliability and validity of the newly updated Balancia 2.5 program using Wii balance board through equipment that can measure center of pressure data with the precision. Design: Cross-sectional study Methods: Twenty-seven healthy adults participated in the study. The subjects were assessed for static balance ability by Accusway, and were assessed for static balance ability on Wii balance board connected to theBalancia 2.5 program.To limit postural fluctuations due to stare, the subjects were asked to look at a 15 cm dot drawn 3 m in front of them for 30 seconds with their eyes open. Static balance ability data such as path length and sway velocity were extracted from all measurement tools.Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity were extracted through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The intra-rater reliability that the same rater shows consistent results through test-retest was a high level at ICC＝0.968 (0.926∼0.986), and inter-rater reliability that the requires consistent results even when measured by different raters was a high level at ICC＝0.943 (0.870∼0.975). The validity was a high level at ICC＝0.948 (0.881∼0.977), which shows whether the measurement tool is properly measuring what it is intended to measure. Conclusions: The Balancia 2.5 program, newly updated through this study, proved to be a program with high reliability and validity in evaluating static balance ability like the existingBalancia 2.0 program.

목차

서론

연구 방법

연구 결과

논의

결론

이해 충돌

참고문헌

키워드

Balance Center of pressure Assessment Reliability Validity